Which type of storage service should the Architect use to meet this requirement?

A Solutions Architect is working for a large IT consulting firm. One of the clients is launching a file

sharing web application in AWS which requires a durable storage service for hosting their static contents such as PDFs, Word Documents, high-resolution images, and many others .

Which type of storage service should the Architect use to meet this requirement?
A . Amazon EBS volume
B . Amazon S3
C . Amazon EC2 instance store
D . Amazon RDS instance

View Answer

Answer: B

Explanation:

Amazon S3 is storage for the Internet. It’s a simple storage service that offers software developers a durable, highly-scalable, reliable, and low-latency data storage infrastructure at very low costs. Amazon S3 provides customers with a highly durable storage infrastructure. Versioning offers an additional level of protection by providing a means of recovery when customers accidentally overwrite or delete objects. Remember that the scenario requires a durable storage for static content. These two keywords are actually referring to S3, since it is highly durable and suitable for storing static content. Hence, Amazon S3 is the correct answer.

Amazon EBS volume is incorrect because this is not as durable compared with S3. In addition, it is best to store the static contents in S3 rather than EBS.

Amazon EC2 instance store is incorrect because it is definitely not suitable – the data it holds will be wiped out immediately once the EC2 instance is restarted.

Amazon RDS instance is incorrect because an RDS instance is just a database and not suitable for storing static content. By default, RDS is not durable, unless you launch it to be in Multi-AZ deployments

configuration.

Explanation:

Reference:

https://aws.amazon.com/s3/faqs/

https://d1.awsstatic.com/whitepapers/Storage/AWS%20Storage%20Services%20Whitepaper-v9.pdf#pa

ge=24

Check out this Amazon S3 Cheat Sheet:

https://tutorialsdojo.com/amazon-s3/