Which two solutions should an app builder suggest to help meet these requirements?

Universal Containers wants some enhancements on its Opportunity page layout to improve efficiency and collaboration.

Which two solutions should an app builder suggest to help meet these requirements? Choose 2 answers
A . Mark stage dependent fields as required on the Opportunity page layout.
B . Use two Tabs components to separate record information from activities.
C . Add a Path component with fields and instructions aligning to stages on the Opportunity.
D . Set up an approval process requiring manager consent at each stage of the Opportunity.

Answer: A, C

Explanation:

Marking stage dependent fields as required on the Opportunity page layout is a good solution to improve efficiency and data quality, as it ensures that users enter the necessary information for each stage of the sales process. Adding a Path component with fields and instructions aligning to stages on the Opportunity is another good solution to improve efficiency and collaboration, as it provides guidance and best practices for users to move the Opportunity along the sales cycle. Using two Tabs components to separate record information from activities may not be an optimal solution, as it may reduce the visibility and accessibility of important data. Setting up an approval process requiring manager consent at each stage of the Opportunity may not be a feasible solution, as it may introduce unnecessary delays and complexity in the sales process

Latest CRT-403 Dumps Valid Version with 340 Q&As

Latest And Valid Q&A | Instant Download | Once Fail, Full Refund

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments