Which strategy should the WELL AP recommend?

A project’s site previously housed a fuel station and an automotive repair shop.

Which strategy should the WELL AP recommend?
A . Hire an experienced professional to perform an environmental site assessment
B . Engage the local community to create a strategic approach about historical use of the site
C . Inspect the site to see if any evidence of the fuel station or automotive repair shop remains
D . Determine if the site is a recognized Brownfield or has a similar designation from the relevant authority

View Answer

Answer: A

Explanation:

According to the WELL v2™ feature W01: Fundamental Water Quality, the project must conduct an environmental site assessment to identify any potential sources of water contamination on or near the site, such as fuel stations, automotive repair shops, landfills, or industrial facilities1. An environmental site assessment is a systematic process of evaluating the environmental conditions of a property, which may include historical research, site inspection, sampling, testing, and risk assessment2. Hiring an experienced professional to perform an environmental site assessment is a recommended strategy to ensure the safety and quality of the water supply for the project. Option B is incorrect, as engaging the local community may not provide sufficient or reliable information about the historical use of the site or the potential contaminants present. Option C is incorrect, as inspecting the site may not reveal the extent or nature of the contamination, which may be hidden or dispersed in the soil, groundwater, or air. Option D is incorrect, as determining if the site is a recognized Brownfield or has a similar designation may not be sufficient to identify the specific contaminants or risks associated with the site, and may not be applicable in some regions or jurisdictions.

Reference: = Standard | WELL V2 – Feature W01: Fundamental Water Quality Environmental Site Assessment – Wikipedia