Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

A hospital recently deployed a RESTful API with Amazon API Gateway and AWS Lambda. The hospital uses API Gateway and Lambda to upload reports that are in PDF format and JPEG format. The hospital needs to modify the Lambda code to identify protected health information (PHI) in the reports

Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
A . Use existing Python libraries to extract the text from the reports and to identify the PHI from the extracted text.
B . Use Amazon Textract to extract the text from the reports Use Amazon SageMaker to identify the PHI from the extracted text.
C . Use Amazon Textract to extract the text from the reports Use Amazon Comprehend Medical to identify the PHI from the extracted text
D . Use Amazon Rekognition to extract the text from the reports Use Amazon Comprehend Medical to identify the PHI from the extracted text

View Answer

Answer: C

Explanation:

To meet the requirements of the company to have access to both AWS and on-premises file storage with minimum latency, a hybrid cloud architecture can be used. One solution is to deploy and configure Amazon FSx for Windows File Server on AWS, which provides fully managed Windows file servers. The on-premises file data can be moved to the FSx File Gateway, which can act as a bridge between on-premises and AWS file storage. The cloud workloads can be configured to use FSx for Windows File Server on AWS, while the on-premises workloads can be configured to use the FSx File Gateway. This solution minimizes operational overhead and requires no significant changes to the existing file access patterns. The connectivity between on-premises and AWS can be established using an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection.

Reference:

AWS FSx for Windows File Server: https://aws.amazon.com/fsx/windows/

AWS FSx File Gateway: https://aws.amazon.com/fsx/file-gateway/

AWS Site-to-Site VPN: https://aws.amazon.com/vpn/site-to-site-vpn/