Which risk mitigation effort should both teams employ to ensure Team AS capital project is only minorly interrupted, and Team B s critical fix can be completed and deployed quickly to end users?

You have an active development team (Team A) building enhancements for an application (App X’). and ate currently using the TEST environment for UAT.

A separate operations team (‘Team B) discovers a critical error in the Production instance of App X that they must remediate However. Team 6 does not have a hotfix stream for which to accomplish this. The available environments are DEV. TEST, and PROD

Which risk mitigation effort should both teams employ to ensure Team AS capital project is only minorly interrupted, and Team B s critical fix can be completed and deployed quickly to end users?
A . Team 8 must communicate to Team A which component will be addressed in the hotfix to avoid overlap of changes It overlap exists, the component must be versioned to its PROD state before being remediated and deployed, and then versioned back to its latest development state If overlap does not exist, the component may be remediated and deployed without any version changes
B . Team A must analyze their current codebase in OEV lo merge the hotfix changes into their latest enhancements. Team B is then requited to wait for the hotfix to follow regular deployment protocols from DEV to the PROO environment.
C . Team 8 must address changes in the TEST environment These changes can then be tested and deployed directly to PROD. Once the deployment is complete. Team B can then communicate their changes to Teams to ensure they are Incorporated as a part of the next release.
D . Team 8 must address the changes directly in PROD. As there is no hotfix stream, and OEV and TEST are being utilized for active development it is best to avoid a conflict of components. Once Team A has completed their enhancements work. Team 6 can update DEV and TEST accordingly.

View Answer

Answer: A

Explanation:

This is the best risk mitigation effort that both teams can employ to ensure that Team A’s capital project is only minorly interrupted, and Team B’s critical fix can be completed and deployed quickly to end users. By communicating with Team A, Team B can identify which component is causing the critical error in PROD, and check if there is any overlap of changes with Team A’s enhancements. If there is an overlap, Team B can version the component to its PROD state, which is the last stable version, before making any changes to fix the error. Then, Team B can deploy the fixed component to PROD, and version it back to its latest development state, which includes Team A’s enhancements. This way, Team B can avoid overwriting or losing any of Team A’s work, and ensure that the component is consistent across all environments. If there is no overlap, Team B can simply make the changes to the component and deploy it to PROD, without affecting Team A’s work.

The other options are not as effective. Option B, having Team A analyze their current codebase in DEV to merge the hotfix changes into their latest enhancements, would delay the deployment of the critical fix, as Team B would have to wait for Team A to finish their analysis and merge. Option C, having Team B address the changes in TEST, would interrupt Team A’s UAT process, and could cause conflicts or errors in TEST or PROD. Option D, having Team B address the changes directly in PROD, would be risky and not recommended, as it could introduce new errors or inconsistencies in PROD.

Verified References: [Appian Deployment Guide], [Appian Best Practices]