Which relationship implementation supports these requirements on its own?

A developer has the following requirements:

Calculate the total amount on an Order.

Calculate the line amount for each Line Item based on quantity selected and price.

Move Line Items to a different Order if a Line Item Is not In stock.

Which relationship implementation supports these requirements on its own?
A . Order has a re-parentable lookup field to Line Item,
B . Order has a re-parentable master-detail field to Line Item.,
C . Line Item has a re-parentable lookup field to Order.
D . Line Item has a re-parentable master-detail field to Order.

Answer: D

Explanation:

To meet the given requirements, we need a relationship that allows:

Calculating the total amount on an Order.

This can be achieved using roll-up summary fields on the Order object to sum up values from its Line Item child records.

Roll-up summary fields are only available on the master object in a master-detail relationship.

Reference: Roll-Up Summary Fields

Calculating the line amount for each Line Item based on quantity selected and price. This calculation can be handled using formula fields or triggers on the Line Item object.

Reference: Formula Fields

Moving Line Items to a different Order if a Line Item is not in stock.

This requires the ability to reparent the Line Item to a different Order.

In a master-detail relationship, you can enable reparenting by selecting "Allow reparenting" in the relationship field settings.

Reference: Allow Reparenting in Master-Detail Relationships Given these considerations, the appropriate relationship is: Line Item has a re-parentable master-detail field to Order. Option D satisfies all the requirements:

Master-detail relationship allows roll-up summary fields on Order.

Reparenting is enabled, allowing Line Items to be moved to a different Order.

Line Item calculations can be handled on the child object.

Incorrect Options:

Option A & C: Lookup relationships do not support roll-up summary fields.

Option B: If the Order has a master-detail field to Line Item, it contradicts the natural parent-child

relationship.

Conclusion:

Option D is the correct choice as it supports roll-up summary fields, allows reparenting, and aligns with the parent-child relationship needed.

Latest DEX-450 Dumps Valid Version with 456 Q&As

Latest And Valid Q&A | Instant Download | Once Fail, Full Refund

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments