Which of the following is the set of principles that enables courts to determine exactly what the written contract says and what that must mean, then the court will uphold that?
A . Order of precedence
B. Rules of interpretation
C. Unfair Contract Act 1977
D. Rules of contract formation
Answer: B
Explanation:
Courts may be called upon to interpret a statute due to disputes over the meaning of a word or phrase contained within a statute. These disputes may arise through a variety of reasons. It has long been held that words are an imperfect means of communication. Omissions may have occurred at the drafting stage, word or phraseology ambiguity, etymological change through time, oversight on specific points, or a failure to adapt legislation to new developments. This may result in the judiciary providing a role in statutory interpretation. Statutory interpretation in its broadest sense is the process of determining the true meaning of a written document. In UK, the Interpretation Act 1978 provides limited scope to assist judges with statutory interpretation in that it only provides standard definitions to common provisions such as a rebuttable presumption that terminology in the masculine gender also include the feminine, and that the singular includes plural.
An order of precedence clause sets out the order in which the contract documents take precedence in the event of an inconsistency.
The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (c 50) is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom which regulates contracts by restricting the operation and legality of some contract terms. It extends to nearly all forms of contract and one of its most important functions is limiting the applicability of disclaimers of liability. The terms extend to both actual contract terms and notices that are seen to constitute a contractual obligation.
Reference:
– Rules of Statutory Interpretation
– CIPS study guide page 43-46
LO 1, AC 1.2
Latest L4M3 Dumps Valid Version with 193 Q&As
Latest And Valid Q&A | Instant Download | Once Fail, Full Refund