Which of the following implementation approach would you consider best in this case?

Green Elk & Company is the world’s leading manufacturer of agricultural and forestry machinery. The former company slogan "Eik always runs has recently been changed to "Eik feeds the world" One of Green Elk’s strategic goals is to increase its revenue in the emerging markets of China, India, and other parts of Asia by 80 % within three years. This requires a new business model that caters to significantly smaller farms with limited budgets You are the Chief Enterprise Architect and the decision was taken to implement regional S/4HANA productive systems while ensuring a high degree of standardization.

Which of the following implementation approach would you consider best in this case?
A . Phased by Application
B . Big Bang
C . Small buck
D . Phased by Company

Answer: D

Explanation:

The best implementation approach for Green Elk & Company in this case is the phased by company approach. This approach involves implementing S/4HANA in one company or business unit at a time, while keeping the existing ERP systems running for the rest of the organization. This approach has several advantages for Green Elk & Company, such as:

It allows them to focus on the specific requirements and challenges of each regional market, such as China, India, and other parts of Asia, and tailor the S/4HANA solution accordingly.

It reduces the risk and complexity of the implementation by limiting the scope and impact of each phase, and enabling faster testing and validation of the S/4HANA system.

It facilitates the adoption and change management of S/4HANA by providing a gradual and smooth transition for the users and stakeholders, and allowing them to learn from the experiences and best practices of each phase.

It ensures a high degree of standardization across the organization by leveraging the SAP Activate methodology, which provides a common framework, tools, and accelerators for S/4HANA implementations.

The other options (A, B, C) are not the best implementation approaches for Green Elk & Company in this case, because they have some drawbacks, such as:

Phased by application: This approach involves implementing S/4HANA by functional area or module,

such as finance, logistics, or human resources. This approach is not suitable for Green Elk & Company because it would create inconsistencies and integration issues between the S/4HANA and ERP systems, and it would not address the specific needs and challenges of each regional market.

Big bang: This approach involves implementing S/4HANA for the entire organization at once, replacing all the existing ERP systems. This approach is not suitable for Green Elk & Company because it would entail a high risk and complexity of the implementation, and it would require a massive effort and investment in terms of time, resources, and change management.

Small buck: This approach involves implementing S/4HANA for a small subset of users or processes within a company or business unit. This approach is not suitable for Green Elk & Company because it would limit the benefits and value of S/4HANA, and it would not support their strategic goal of increasing their revenue in the emerging markets.

Verified

Reference: SAP Activate Methodology, SAP S/4HANA Implementation Scenarios, SAP S/4HANA Deployment Options