Which of the following does NOT contribute to a more effective review preparation by the Technical Test Analyst?

Which of the following does NOT contribute to a more effective review preparation by the Technical Test Analyst?
A . Ensure that participants spend enough time during preparation, e.g.. by managing checking rate (number of pages checked per hour during review preparation).
B . Managing logging rate (number of defects logged per minute during the meeting).
C . The usage of review checklists.
D . Review training for the Technical Test Analyst.

Answer: B

Explanation:

An effective review preparation by a Technical Test Analyst includes ensuring that participants are well-prepared and that they spend enough time on preparation, which can be managed by checking the rate (option A). The use of review checklists (option C) and providing review training (option D) are also methods that contribute to more effective review preparation. However, managing the logging rate (option B), or the number of defects logged per minute during the meeting, is not related to the preparation phase but rather to the defect detection and logging phase during the actual review meeting. It is not a preparation activity but a review execution activity.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments