Which of the following can be used to fulfill this requirement?

A company has a web application that uses Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server. A file share is used to store the application data on the network-attached storage of the company’s on-premises data center. To achieve a highly available system, they plan to migrate the application and file share to AWS.

Which of the following can be used to fulfill this requirement?
A . Migrate the existing file share configuration to Amazon FSx for Windows File Server.
B . Migrate the existing file share configuration to AWS Storage Gateway.
C . Migrate the existing file share configuration to Amazon EB
E . Migrate the existing file share configuration to Amazon EF

View Answer

Answer: A

Explanation:

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server provides fully managed Microsoft Windows file servers, backed by a fully native Windows file system. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server has the features, performance, and compatibility to easily lift and shift enterprise applications to the AWS Cloud. It is accessible from Windows, Linux, and macOS compute instances and devices. Thousands of compute instances and devices can access a file system concurrently.

In this scenario, you need to migrate your existing file share configuration to the cloud. Among the

options given, the best possible answer is Amazon FSx. A file share is a specific folder in your file system, including the folder’s subfolders, which you make accessible to your compute instances via the SMB protocol. To migrate file share configurations from your on-premises file system, you must migrate your files first to Amazon FSx before migrating your file share configuration.

Hence, the correct answer is: Migrate the existing file share configuration to Amazon FSx for Windows File Server.

The option that says: Migrate the existing file share configuration to AWS Storage Gateway is incorrect because AWS Storage Gateway is primarily used to integrate your on-premises network to AWS but not for migrating your applications. Using a file share in Storage Gateway implies that you will still keep your on-premises systems, and not entirely migrate it.

The option that says: Migrate the existing file share configuration to Amazon EFS is incorrect because it is stated in the scenario that the company is using a file share that runs on a Windows server. Remember that Amazon EFS only supports Linux workloads.

The option that says: Migrate the existing file share configuration to Amazon EBS is incorrect because

EBS is primarily used as block storage for EC2 instances and not as a shared file system. A file share is

a specific folder in a file system that you can access using a server message block (SMB) protocol.

Amazon EBS does not support SMB protocol.

References:

https://aws.amazon.com/fsx/windows/faqs/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/migrate-file-share-config-to-fsx.html

Check out this Amazon FSx Cheat Sheet:

https://tutorialsdojo.com/amazon-fsx/