Which method is the MOST cost-effective for hosting the website?

A development team needs to host a website that will be accessed by other teams. The website contents consist of HTML, CSS, client-side JavaScript, and images

Which method is the MOST cost-effective for hosting the website?
A . Containerize the website and host it in AWS Fargate.
B . Create an Amazon S3 bucket and host the website there
C . Deploy a web server on an Amazon EC2 instance to host the website.
D . Configure an Application Loa d Balancer with an AWS Lambda target that uses the Express js framework.

Answer: B

Explanation:

In Static Websites, Web pages are returned by the server which are prebuilt.

They use simple languages such as HTML, CSS, or JavaScript.

There is no processing of content on the server (according to the user) in Static Websites. Web pages are returned by the server with no change therefore, static Websites are fast.

There is no interaction with databases.

Also, they are less costly as the host does not need to support server-side processing with different languages.

============

In Dynamic Websites, Web pages are returned by the server which are processed during runtime means they are not prebuilt web pages but they are built during runtime according to the user’s demand.

These use server-side scripting languages such as PHP, Node.js, ASP.NET and many more supported by the server.

So, they are slower than static websites but updates and interaction with databases are possible.

Latest SAA-C03 Dumps Valid Version with 400 Q&As

Latest And Valid Q&A | Instant Download | Once Fail, Full Refund

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments