Which design choice should be used to start the utility processes and minimize the load on the execution engines?

You are designing a process that is anticipated to be executed multiple times a day. This process retrieves data from an external system and then calls various utility processes as needed. The mam process will not use the results of the utility processes, and there are no user forms anywhere.

Which design choice should be used to start the utility processes and minimize the load on the execution engines?
A . Use the Start Process Smart Service to start the utility processes.
B . Start the utility processes via a subprocess synchronously.
C . Use Process Messaging lo star! the utility process.
D . Start the utility processes via a subprocess asynchronously

View Answer

Answer: D

Explanation:

Starting utility processes via asynchronous subprocesses allows the main process to continue execution without having to wait for the utility processes to complete. This reduces the load on the main execution engine and improves overall efficiency.

Option A (Using the Start Process Smart Service to start utility processes) can initiate processes but might impose a greater load on the execution engines, as it might continuously wait for subprocess responses during execution.

Option B (Starting utility processes via a subprocess synchronously) means the main process will wait for the subprocess to complete before continuing, which increases the load on the execution engine and reduces efficiency.

Option C (Using Process Messaging to start the utility process) is a viable approach, but asynchronous subprocesses are generally more efficient for handling utility processes that do not interact with the main process.