Which action would be most effective in mitigating the problem of offensive text outputs?

A Generative Al Engineer is tasked with improving the RAG quality by addressing its inflammatory outputs.

Which action would be most effective in mitigating the problem of offensive text outputs?
A . Increase the frequency of upstream data updates
B . Inform the user of the expected RAG behavior
C . Restrict access to the data sources to a limited number of users
D . Curate upstream data properly that includes manual review before it is fed into the RAG system

Answer: D

Explanation:

Addressing offensive or inflammatory outputs in a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system is critical for improving user experience and ensuring ethical AI deployment.

Here’s why D is the most effective approach:

Manual data curation: The root cause of offensive outputs often comes from the underlying data used to train the model or populate the retrieval system. By manually curating the upstream data and conducting thorough reviews before the data is fed into the RAG system, the engineer can filter out harmful, offensive, or inappropriate content.

Improving data quality: Curating data ensures the system retrieves and generates responses from a high-quality, well-vetted dataset. This directly impacts the relevance and appropriateness of the outputs from the RAG system, preventing inflammatory content from being included in responses.

Effectiveness: This strategy directly tackles the problem at its source (the data) rather than just mitigating the consequences (such as informing users or restricting access). It ensures that the system consistently provides non-offensive, relevant information.

Other options, such as increasing the frequency of data updates or informing users about behavior expectations, may not directly mitigate the generation of inflammatory outputs.