What is an expected outcome of this transition to container-based Mule application deployments?

An organization currently uses a multi-node Mule runtime deployment model within their datacenter, so each Mule runtime hosts several Mule applications. The organization is planning to transition to a deployment model based on Docker containers in a Kubernetes cluster. The organization has already created a standard Docker image containing a Mule runtime and all required dependencies (including a JVM), but excluding the Mule application itself.

What is an expected outcome of this transition to container-based Mule application deployments?
A . Required redesign of Mule applications to follow microservice architecture principles
B . Required migration to the Docker and Kubernetes-based Anypoint Platform – Private Cloud Edition
C . Required change to the URL endpoints used by clients to send requests to the Mule applications
D . Guaranteed consistency of execution environments across all deployments of a Mule application

Answer: A

Explanation:

* Organization can continue using existing load balancer even if backend application changes are there. So option A is ruled out.

* As Mule runtime is within their datacenter, this model is RTF and not PCE. So option C is ruled out. Mule runtime deployment model within their datacenter, so each Mule runtime hosts several Mule applications — This mean PCE or Hybird not RTF – Also mentioned in Question is that – Mule runtime is hosting several Mule Application, so that also rules out RTF and as for hosting multiple Application it will have Domain project which need redesign to make it microservice architecture

Correct Answer. Required redesign of Mule applications to follow microservice Explanation: architecture principles