The ABC approach involves classifying inventory items by unit cost, with expensive items classified as ‘A’ items and low cost items classified as ‘C’ items. Is this statement true?

The ABC approach involves classifying inventory items by unit cost, with expensive items classified as ‘A’ items and low cost items classified as ‘C’ items. Is this statement true?
A . Yes, ‘A’ items represent approximately 20% of total unit prices
B . Yes, ‘C’ items with the lowest unit prices are the tail spends
C . No, ABC analysis considers the usage of each inventory item
D . No, ABC analysis considers the supply risks associated with an inventory item

View Answer

Answer: C

Explanation:

ABC analysis is an approach for classifying inventory items based on the items’ consumption values. Consumption value is the total value of an item consumed over a specified time period, for example a year.

The approach is based on the Pareto principle to help manage what matters and is applied in this context:

– A items are goods where annual consumption value is the highest. Applying the Pareto principle (also referred to as the 80/20 rule where 80 percent of the output is determined by 20 percent of the input), they comprise a relatively small number of items but have a relatively high consumption value. So it’s logical that analysis and control of this class is relatively intense, since there is the greatest potential to reduce costs or losses.

– B items are interclass items. Their consumption values are lower than A items but higher than C items. A key point of having this interclass group is to watch items close to A item and C item classes that would alter their stock management policies if they drift closer to class A or class

C. Stock management is itself a cost. So there needs to be a balance between controls to protect the asset class and the value at risk of loss, or the cost of analysis and the potential value returned by reducing class costs. So, the scope of this class and the inventory management policies are determined by the estimated cost-benefit of class cost reduction, and loss control systems and processes.

– C items have the lowest consumption value. This class has a relatively high proportion of the total

number of lines but with relatively low consumption values. Logically, it’s not usually cost-effective to deploy tight inventory controls, as the value at risk of significant loss is relatively low and the cost of analysis would typically yield relatively low returns. LO 2, AC 2.1