Question #1
A CEO of a domestic enterprise plans to expand its operations globally. The CEO has selected enterprise goals using the COBIT goals cascade and has tasked the CIO with tailoring COBIT as required.
After selecting the relevant alignment goals, which of the following should be the CIOs NEXT priority?
- A . Management objectives
- B . Design factors
- C . Organizational structure
- D . Management activities
Correct Answer: B
B
Explanation:
In the COBIT 2019 framework, after selecting the relevant alignment goals, the CIO’s next priority should be identifying and understanding the design factors. Design factors are crucial as they influence the tailoring of the governance system to align with the specific needs and context of the enterprise.
The COBIT 2019 Design Guide emphasizes that design factors impact the governance and management objectives and help in customizing the COBIT framework. The selection and analysis of design factors ensure that the governance system is practical and relevant to the enterprise’s environment.
Design Factors in COBIT 2019 include:
Enterprise Strategy: Different strategies (e.g., growth, innovation, cost leadership) require different governance approaches.
Enterprise Goals: Aligning IT-related goals with overall enterprise goals.
Risk Profile: Understanding the risk appetite and tolerance.
I&T-Related Issues: Identifying issues specific to information and technology.
Threat Landscape: Assessing external and internal threats.
Compliance Requirements: Meeting legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations.
Role of IT: Determining IT’s role in the enterprise (e.g., support, factory, turnaround, strategic).
Sourcing Model: Whether IT services are in-house, outsourced, or a combination.
IT Implementation Methods: Traditional, agile, or hybrid methods used in IT initiatives.
Technology Adoption Strategy: How quickly the enterprise adopts new technologies.
Enterprise Size: The size of the enterprise can affect governance and management practices.
The process of tailoring COBIT involves:
Analyzing Design Factors: Understanding and documenting the enterprise’s design factors.
Designing the Tailored Governance System: Based on the analyzed design factors, select and customize the governance and management objectives.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide
Reference: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4. This chapter provides an overview of the COBIT goals cascade and the importance of aligning enterprise goals with IT-related goals.
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2. This chapter describes design factors in detail and their role in tailoring the governance system.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3. This chapter outlines the steps for implementing a tailored COBIT governance system, emphasizing the importance of understanding and leveraging design factors.
Thus, the CIO should prioritize understanding the design factors to ensure the tailored COBIT governance system aligns with the enterprise’s specific context and requirements. This approach ensures the governance system is both effective and efficient, addressing the unique challenges and opportunities of the enterprise.
B
Explanation:
In the COBIT 2019 framework, after selecting the relevant alignment goals, the CIO’s next priority should be identifying and understanding the design factors. Design factors are crucial as they influence the tailoring of the governance system to align with the specific needs and context of the enterprise.
The COBIT 2019 Design Guide emphasizes that design factors impact the governance and management objectives and help in customizing the COBIT framework. The selection and analysis of design factors ensure that the governance system is practical and relevant to the enterprise’s environment.
Design Factors in COBIT 2019 include:
Enterprise Strategy: Different strategies (e.g., growth, innovation, cost leadership) require different governance approaches.
Enterprise Goals: Aligning IT-related goals with overall enterprise goals.
Risk Profile: Understanding the risk appetite and tolerance.
I&T-Related Issues: Identifying issues specific to information and technology.
Threat Landscape: Assessing external and internal threats.
Compliance Requirements: Meeting legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations.
Role of IT: Determining IT’s role in the enterprise (e.g., support, factory, turnaround, strategic).
Sourcing Model: Whether IT services are in-house, outsourced, or a combination.
IT Implementation Methods: Traditional, agile, or hybrid methods used in IT initiatives.
Technology Adoption Strategy: How quickly the enterprise adopts new technologies.
Enterprise Size: The size of the enterprise can affect governance and management practices.
The process of tailoring COBIT involves:
Analyzing Design Factors: Understanding and documenting the enterprise’s design factors.
Designing the Tailored Governance System: Based on the analyzed design factors, select and customize the governance and management objectives.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide
Reference: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4. This chapter provides an overview of the COBIT goals cascade and the importance of aligning enterprise goals with IT-related goals.
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2. This chapter describes design factors in detail and their role in tailoring the governance system.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3. This chapter outlines the steps for implementing a tailored COBIT governance system, emphasizing the importance of understanding and leveraging design factors.
Thus, the CIO should prioritize understanding the design factors to ensure the tailored COBIT governance system aligns with the enterprise’s specific context and requirements. This approach ensures the governance system is both effective and efficient, addressing the unique challenges and opportunities of the enterprise.
Question #2
Which of the following components should be considered in addition to processes, policies and procedures when designing a governance system?
- A . Information items
- B . Knowledge flows
- C . Data flows
- D . Configuration items
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
In COBIT 2019, information is seen as a key enabler because it underpins effective governance and management practices. Information items refer to the data and information that the organization needs to achieve its goals and support decision-making processes. This includes various types of information such as financial data, operational data, compliance reports, and performance metrics.
The COBIT 2019 Framework identifies seven components of a governance system:
Processes: Structured sets of practices and activities to achieve specific objectives and produce a set of outputs in support of achieving overall IT-related goals.
Organizational Structures: Key decision-making entities in an enterprise.
Principles, Policies, and Frameworks: Established rules and guidelines.
Information: All information produced and used by the enterprise, crucial for governance.
Culture, Ethics, and Behavior: Encompasses the values of the enterprise and its employees.
People, Skills, and Competencies: Required for successful completion of all activities and decision-making.
Services, Infrastructure, and Applications: Enabling and supporting the enterprise through its use of technology.
Information items fall under the fourth component, "Information," which is necessary for effective governance.
Information items ensure that:
Decision-makers have the relevant data to make informed decisions.
There is transparency and accountability in reporting.
The organization can monitor and measure performance against strategic objectives.
Compliance with regulatory and legal requirements is maintained.
COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation Guide
Reference: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 5: This chapter details the governance and management objectives and their components, highlighting the importance of information.
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2: This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the components of a governance system, including information items.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter explains how to incorporate various governance system components, such as information items, into the tailored governance system design.
Considering information items is essential because they provide the necessary context and insights for effective governance. By ensuring that information is accurate, timely, and relevant, an organization can better align its IT governance with its overall business objectives, thereby enhancing decision-making, performance tracking, and compliance.
A
Explanation:
In COBIT 2019, information is seen as a key enabler because it underpins effective governance and management practices. Information items refer to the data and information that the organization needs to achieve its goals and support decision-making processes. This includes various types of information such as financial data, operational data, compliance reports, and performance metrics.
The COBIT 2019 Framework identifies seven components of a governance system:
Processes: Structured sets of practices and activities to achieve specific objectives and produce a set of outputs in support of achieving overall IT-related goals.
Organizational Structures: Key decision-making entities in an enterprise.
Principles, Policies, and Frameworks: Established rules and guidelines.
Information: All information produced and used by the enterprise, crucial for governance.
Culture, Ethics, and Behavior: Encompasses the values of the enterprise and its employees.
People, Skills, and Competencies: Required for successful completion of all activities and decision-making.
Services, Infrastructure, and Applications: Enabling and supporting the enterprise through its use of technology.
Information items fall under the fourth component, "Information," which is necessary for effective governance.
Information items ensure that:
Decision-makers have the relevant data to make informed decisions.
There is transparency and accountability in reporting.
The organization can monitor and measure performance against strategic objectives.
Compliance with regulatory and legal requirements is maintained.
COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation Guide
Reference: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 5: This chapter details the governance and management objectives and their components, highlighting the importance of information.
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2: This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the components of a governance system, including information items.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter explains how to incorporate various governance system components, such as information items, into the tailored governance system design.
Considering information items is essential because they provide the necessary context and insights for effective governance. By ensuring that information is accurate, timely, and relevant, an organization can better align its IT governance with its overall business objectives, thereby enhancing decision-making, performance tracking, and compliance.
Question #3
When is it MOST important for an enterprise to apply the full governance design workflow and carefully consider all design factors?
- A . When the enterprise requires a broad, holistic, and comprehensive view of its governance system
- B . When key stakeholders cannot agree on governance objectives, strategy, and priorities
- C . When the enterprise needs to focus on one key initiative requiring a major investment
- D . When the enterprise must meet complex regulatory requirements for which the enterprise is not currently in compliance
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Applying the full governance design workflow and carefully considering all design factors is most important when an enterprise requires a broad, holistic, and comprehensive view of its governance system. This scenario is where the entire spectrum of the governance framework needs to be analyzed and tailored to ensure it meets the enterprise’s overall strategic goals and operational needs.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2: This chapter elaborates on how design factors influence the creation of a tailored governance system that is comprehensive and aligns with the enterprise’s unique context.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4: This chapter discusses the importance of a holistic approach in establishing governance and the necessity of considering all design factors to create a system that encompasses all aspects of enterprise IT and business objectives.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter provides steps for implementing a comprehensive governance system, emphasizing the importance of a full governance design workflow to achieve a thorough and effective governance structure.
By following the full governance design workflow, enterprises can ensure that their governance framework is not only comprehensive but also customized to address specific needs, thereby improving alignment, efficiency, and compliance across the organization.
A
Explanation:
Applying the full governance design workflow and carefully considering all design factors is most important when an enterprise requires a broad, holistic, and comprehensive view of its governance system. This scenario is where the entire spectrum of the governance framework needs to be analyzed and tailored to ensure it meets the enterprise’s overall strategic goals and operational needs.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2: This chapter elaborates on how design factors influence the creation of a tailored governance system that is comprehensive and aligns with the enterprise’s unique context.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4: This chapter discusses the importance of a holistic approach in establishing governance and the necessity of considering all design factors to create a system that encompasses all aspects of enterprise IT and business objectives.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter provides steps for implementing a comprehensive governance system, emphasizing the importance of a full governance design workflow to achieve a thorough and effective governance structure.
By following the full governance design workflow, enterprises can ensure that their governance framework is not only comprehensive but also customized to address specific needs, thereby improving alignment, efficiency, and compliance across the organization.
Question #4
Which function within the IT corporate structure is responsible for classifying information using an agreed-upon classification scheme for a new data collection system?
- A . Information security
- B . Information privacy
- C . .IT governance
- D . Enterprise architecture
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
The function within the IT corporate structure responsible for classifying information using an agreed-upon classification scheme for a new data collection system is the Information Security function. Information security ensures that data is properly classified to protect it according to its sensitivity and criticality.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO13 (Managed Security): This objective outlines the responsibilities of the information security function, which includes defining and implementing information classification schemes.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter details how information security policies and practices should be established, including the classification of information assets.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Deliver, Service and Support (DSS05, Managed Security Services): This objective highlights the role of information security in managing security services, including data classification and protection measures.
By classifying information, the information security function ensures that data is adequately protected against unauthorized access and breaches, adhering to compliance requirements and supporting the overall security posture of the enterprise.
A
Explanation:
The function within the IT corporate structure responsible for classifying information using an agreed-upon classification scheme for a new data collection system is the Information Security function. Information security ensures that data is properly classified to protect it according to its sensitivity and criticality.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO13 (Managed Security): This objective outlines the responsibilities of the information security function, which includes defining and implementing information classification schemes.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter details how information security policies and practices should be established, including the classification of information assets.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Deliver, Service and Support (DSS05, Managed Security Services): This objective highlights the role of information security in managing security services, including data classification and protection measures.
By classifying information, the information security function ensures that data is adequately protected against unauthorized access and breaches, adhering to compliance requirements and supporting the overall security posture of the enterprise.
Question #5
What can management do to help ensure a planned IT initiative will meet future state objectives?
- A . Conduct stage gate reviews during implementation.
- B . Establish a return on investment (ROI)target.
- C . Monitor key risk indicators (KRIs).
- D . Define operational performance metrics.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
To ensure a planned IT initiative meets future state objectives, management should conduct stage gate reviews during implementation. Stage gate reviews are a critical part of project management and governance, ensuring that projects are on track, meeting their objectives, and adhering to the planned schedule and budget.
Stage gate reviews are formal checkpoints at various phases of a project where progress is assessed, and decisions are made about whether to proceed to the next stage. These reviews help to ensure that:
The project remains aligned with business objectives and stakeholder expectations.
Risks are identified and managed effectively.
Necessary adjustments are made based on the current project status and future state objectives.
COBIT 2019 emphasizes the importance of governance and management practices to ensure successful project outcomes. Stage gate reviews align with COBIT’s governance objectives by providing oversight, ensuring alignment with business goals, and enabling course corrections when needed.
COBIT 2019 Framework
Reference: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, BAI01 Manage Programs and Projects: This objective highlights the importance of structured project management and governance practices, including stage gate reviews.
COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Emphasizes the need for effective monitoring and control mechanisms throughout the project lifecycle to ensure alignment with enterprise goals.
Conducting stage gate reviews is a proactive measure to ensure that IT initiatives stay on track and achieve their intended future state objectives, making it the best choice among the given options.
A
Explanation:
To ensure a planned IT initiative meets future state objectives, management should conduct stage gate reviews during implementation. Stage gate reviews are a critical part of project management and governance, ensuring that projects are on track, meeting their objectives, and adhering to the planned schedule and budget.
Stage gate reviews are formal checkpoints at various phases of a project where progress is assessed, and decisions are made about whether to proceed to the next stage. These reviews help to ensure that:
The project remains aligned with business objectives and stakeholder expectations.
Risks are identified and managed effectively.
Necessary adjustments are made based on the current project status and future state objectives.
COBIT 2019 emphasizes the importance of governance and management practices to ensure successful project outcomes. Stage gate reviews align with COBIT’s governance objectives by providing oversight, ensuring alignment with business goals, and enabling course corrections when needed.
COBIT 2019 Framework
Reference: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, BAI01 Manage Programs and Projects: This objective highlights the importance of structured project management and governance practices, including stage gate reviews.
COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Emphasizes the need for effective monitoring and control mechanisms throughout the project lifecycle to ensure alignment with enterprise goals.
Conducting stage gate reviews is a proactive measure to ensure that IT initiatives stay on track and achieve their intended future state objectives, making it the best choice among the given options.
Question #6
Which of the following is an example of a specific focus area to which COBIT could be customized?
- A . Information items
- B . Cybersecurity
- C . Capability levels
- D . Enterprise goals
Correct Answer: B
B
Explanation:
An example of a specific focus area to which COBIT could be customized is "cybersecurity." COBIT 2019 allows for customization to address specific governance and management needs, and cybersecurity is a critical area that often requires tailored governance practices.
COBIT 2019 includes the concept of focus areas, which are specific governance topics that require a tailored approach. Cybersecurity is a prime example of a focus area because it encompasses a range of activities and controls that need to be integrated into the overall governance framework.
Cybersecurity Focus Area in COBIT 2019:
Tailoring Governance Practices: COBIT 2019 can be adapted to address specific cybersecurity needs, ensuring that the enterprise has robust policies, processes, and controls in place to protect its information assets.
Aligning with Industry Standards: Customizing COBIT for cybersecurity helps align IT governance with industry standards such as ISO/IEC 27001, NIST Cybersecurity Framework, and others.
Risk Management: Focused cybersecurity governance ensures that risks are identified, assessed, and mitigated effectively.
Compliance: Helps ensure compliance with regulatory requirements related to cybersecurity, such as GDPR, CCPA, and others.
COBIT 2019 Framework
Reference: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 5: Discusses the concept of focus areas and how COBIT can be customized to address specific governance topics, including cybersecurity.
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4: Provides guidance on how to tailor COBIT to specific focus areas, ensuring relevant and effective governance practices.
Customizing COBIT to focus on cybersecurity ensures that the enterprise can address specific security challenges, align with best practices, and maintain robust governance over its cybersecurity initiatives, making it the best choice among the given options.
B
Explanation:
An example of a specific focus area to which COBIT could be customized is "cybersecurity." COBIT 2019 allows for customization to address specific governance and management needs, and cybersecurity is a critical area that often requires tailored governance practices.
COBIT 2019 includes the concept of focus areas, which are specific governance topics that require a tailored approach. Cybersecurity is a prime example of a focus area because it encompasses a range of activities and controls that need to be integrated into the overall governance framework.
Cybersecurity Focus Area in COBIT 2019:
Tailoring Governance Practices: COBIT 2019 can be adapted to address specific cybersecurity needs, ensuring that the enterprise has robust policies, processes, and controls in place to protect its information assets.
Aligning with Industry Standards: Customizing COBIT for cybersecurity helps align IT governance with industry standards such as ISO/IEC 27001, NIST Cybersecurity Framework, and others.
Risk Management: Focused cybersecurity governance ensures that risks are identified, assessed, and mitigated effectively.
Compliance: Helps ensure compliance with regulatory requirements related to cybersecurity, such as GDPR, CCPA, and others.
COBIT 2019 Framework
Reference: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 5: Discusses the concept of focus areas and how COBIT can be customized to address specific governance topics, including cybersecurity.
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4: Provides guidance on how to tailor COBIT to specific focus areas, ensuring relevant and effective governance practices.
Customizing COBIT to focus on cybersecurity ensures that the enterprise can address specific security challenges, align with best practices, and maintain robust governance over its cybersecurity initiatives, making it the best choice among the given options.
Question #7
While tailoring design factors, which of the following roles of IT demonstrates the HIGHEST level of enterprise dependency on I&T?
- A . Turnaround
- B . Strategic
- C . Support
- D . Factory
Correct Answer: B
B
Explanation:
In COBIT 2019, the role of IT that demonstrates the highest level of enterprise dependency on Information and Technology (I&T) is Strategic. This role indicates that IT is not only integral to the business but is also a driver of innovation and strategic initiatives.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter explains the various roles of IT within an enterprise. The strategic role is where IT is pivotal for business transformation, competitive advantage, and achieving strategic business goals.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4: This chapter highlights the impact of the strategic role of IT on the governance system, emphasizing the high dependency on IT for achieving business objectives.
Enterprises with IT in a strategic role rely heavily on IT to drive business strategies, innovate, and gain a competitive edge, making it the highest level of dependency on I&T.
B
Explanation:
In COBIT 2019, the role of IT that demonstrates the highest level of enterprise dependency on Information and Technology (I&T) is Strategic. This role indicates that IT is not only integral to the business but is also a driver of innovation and strategic initiatives.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter explains the various roles of IT within an enterprise. The strategic role is where IT is pivotal for business transformation, competitive advantage, and achieving strategic business goals.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4: This chapter highlights the impact of the strategic role of IT on the governance system, emphasizing the high dependency on IT for achieving business objectives.
Enterprises with IT in a strategic role rely heavily on IT to drive business strategies, innovate, and gain a competitive edge, making it the highest level of dependency on I&T.
Question #8
What is a PRIMARY responsibility of the program management office during the planning phase that defines the initial program concept business case?
- A . Identifying business priorities and business strategy dependent on IT
- B . Providing advice regarding controls and potential risks
- C . Identifying success factors and a way to monitor progress
- D . Ensuring that both needs and business objectives are stated
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
The primary responsibility of the program management office (PMO) during the planning phase that defines the initial program concept business case is ensuring that both needs and business objectives are stated. This responsibility ensures that the program aligns with the enterprise’s strategic goals and addresses specific business needs.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, BAI01 (Managed Programs): This objective emphasizes the role of the PMO in defining program requirements and business objectives during the planning phase.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter outlines the responsibilities of the PMO in program planning, which includes articulating business needs and objectives to ensure alignment and clarity.
By clearly stating needs and business objectives, the PMO sets a solid foundation for the program, facilitating alignment with strategic goals and effective resource allocation.
D
Explanation:
The primary responsibility of the program management office (PMO) during the planning phase that defines the initial program concept business case is ensuring that both needs and business objectives are stated. This responsibility ensures that the program aligns with the enterprise’s strategic goals and addresses specific business needs.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, BAI01 (Managed Programs): This objective emphasizes the role of the PMO in defining program requirements and business objectives during the planning phase.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter outlines the responsibilities of the PMO in program planning, which includes articulating business needs and objectives to ensure alignment and clarity.
By clearly stating needs and business objectives, the PMO sets a solid foundation for the program, facilitating alignment with strategic goals and effective resource allocation.
Question #9
Which of the following is a KEY consideration when determining the initial scope of a governance system?
- A . Compliance requirements faced by the enterprise
- B . The size of the enterprise
- C . The role of IT within the enterprise
- D . Current l&T-related issues of the enterprise
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
When determining the initial scope of a governance system, one of the key considerations is the current I&T-related issues of the enterprise. Understanding and addressing these issues ensures that the governance system is relevant and focused on the areas that need the most attention and improvement. This approach aligns with the practical and contextual nature of COBIT 2019, which emphasizes tailoring governance solutions to the specific needs and circumstances of the enterprise.
Detailed Explanation with
Reference: Current I&T-Related Issues (Option D):
COBIT 2019 stresses the importance of understanding the specific issues and challenges an enterprise is facing in its current I&T environment. These issues could include inefficiencies, security vulnerabilities, compliance gaps, misalignment with business objectives, or any other problems impacting the performance and value delivery of IT.
Addressing these issues directly in the initial scope ensures that the governance system can provide immediate value by targeting the most critical areas. This focus helps in demonstrating early successes and building credibility for the governance initiative.
According to the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, understanding current issues allows the organization to prioritize actions that will have the most significant impact on improving governance and management practices.
Compliance Requirements (Option A):
Compliance requirements are essential and need to be considered when designing a governance system, but they are part of a broader context rather than the key initial driver. They ensure that the governance system meets regulatory and legal standards but do not necessarily prioritize the most urgent internal issues.
Size of the Enterprise (Option B):
The size of the enterprise influences the complexity and scalability of the governance system but is not a primary consideration for the initial scope. The focus should be on specific needs and issues rather than just the size.
Role of IT within the Enterprise (Option C):
The strategic role of IT is crucial for determining the overall governance approach, but it is more about aligning IT with business goals rather than pinpointing specific initial issues to address. It informs the design but does not drive the immediate focus of the initial scope.
Conclusion: The correct answer is
D. Current I&T-related issues of the enterprise. Focusing on these issues ensures that the governance system addresses the most pressing needs and delivers tangible improvements, which is a fundamental principle in the COBIT 2019 framework.
Reference: ISACA. COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide: Implementing and Optimizing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.
ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.
D
Explanation:
When determining the initial scope of a governance system, one of the key considerations is the current I&T-related issues of the enterprise. Understanding and addressing these issues ensures that the governance system is relevant and focused on the areas that need the most attention and improvement. This approach aligns with the practical and contextual nature of COBIT 2019, which emphasizes tailoring governance solutions to the specific needs and circumstances of the enterprise.
Detailed Explanation with
Reference: Current I&T-Related Issues (Option D):
COBIT 2019 stresses the importance of understanding the specific issues and challenges an enterprise is facing in its current I&T environment. These issues could include inefficiencies, security vulnerabilities, compliance gaps, misalignment with business objectives, or any other problems impacting the performance and value delivery of IT.
Addressing these issues directly in the initial scope ensures that the governance system can provide immediate value by targeting the most critical areas. This focus helps in demonstrating early successes and building credibility for the governance initiative.
According to the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, understanding current issues allows the organization to prioritize actions that will have the most significant impact on improving governance and management practices.
Compliance Requirements (Option A):
Compliance requirements are essential and need to be considered when designing a governance system, but they are part of a broader context rather than the key initial driver. They ensure that the governance system meets regulatory and legal standards but do not necessarily prioritize the most urgent internal issues.
Size of the Enterprise (Option B):
The size of the enterprise influences the complexity and scalability of the governance system but is not a primary consideration for the initial scope. The focus should be on specific needs and issues rather than just the size.
Role of IT within the Enterprise (Option C):
The strategic role of IT is crucial for determining the overall governance approach, but it is more about aligning IT with business goals rather than pinpointing specific initial issues to address. It informs the design but does not drive the immediate focus of the initial scope.
Conclusion: The correct answer is
D. Current I&T-related issues of the enterprise. Focusing on these issues ensures that the governance system addresses the most pressing needs and delivers tangible improvements, which is a fundamental principle in the COBIT 2019 framework.
Reference: ISACA. COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide: Implementing and Optimizing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.
ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.
Question #10
In which of the following phases should long-term targets be adjusted based on experience?
- A . How do we get there?
- B . Where are we now?
- C . What needs to be done?
- D . Did we get there?
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
In the COBIT 2019 implementation lifecycle, the phase where long-term targets should be adjusted based on experience is the evaluation phase, known as "Did we get there?". This phase involves assessing the results of the implemented governance and management practices to determine if the objectives have been met and to identify areas for improvement.
Detailed Explanation with
Reference: How do we get there? (Option A):
This phase focuses on developing and executing the plan to achieve the governance objectives. It involves identifying the steps, resources, and timeline needed to reach the desired state. While important for planning, this phase is more about action and implementation rather than evaluation and adjustment of long-term targets.
Where are we now? (Option B):
This phase involves assessing the current state of the governance system, identifying gaps, and understanding the baseline. It provides the foundational information needed to plan improvements but does not involve adjusting long-term targets.
What needs to be done? (Option C):
This phase is concerned with identifying the specific actions and initiatives required to address the gaps and achieve the governance objectives. It involves planning and prioritizing activities but not the evaluation and adjustment of long-term targets based on experience.
Did we get there? (Option D):
In this phase, the enterprise evaluates the outcomes of the implemented governance system against the set objectives and targets. It involves assessing whether the desired goals were achieved and analyzing the effectiveness of the governance practices. Based on this evaluation, the organization can adjust long-term targets to better align with practical experience, new insights, and evolving business needs. This phase is critical for continuous improvement and ensuring that the governance system remains relevant and effective over time.
According to the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, this phase includes reviewing performance metrics, stakeholder feedback, and lessons learned from the implementation process. These insights are then used to refine and adjust long-term targets to improve future performance and outcomes.
Conclusion: The correct answer is
D. Did we get there?. This phase involves evaluating the results of the governance implementation, learning from the experience, and making necessary adjustments to long-term targets to ensure continuous improvement and alignment with the enterprise’s goals.
Reference: ISACA. COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide: Implementing and Optimizing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.
ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.
D
Explanation:
In the COBIT 2019 implementation lifecycle, the phase where long-term targets should be adjusted based on experience is the evaluation phase, known as "Did we get there?". This phase involves assessing the results of the implemented governance and management practices to determine if the objectives have been met and to identify areas for improvement.
Detailed Explanation with
Reference: How do we get there? (Option A):
This phase focuses on developing and executing the plan to achieve the governance objectives. It involves identifying the steps, resources, and timeline needed to reach the desired state. While important for planning, this phase is more about action and implementation rather than evaluation and adjustment of long-term targets.
Where are we now? (Option B):
This phase involves assessing the current state of the governance system, identifying gaps, and understanding the baseline. It provides the foundational information needed to plan improvements but does not involve adjusting long-term targets.
What needs to be done? (Option C):
This phase is concerned with identifying the specific actions and initiatives required to address the gaps and achieve the governance objectives. It involves planning and prioritizing activities but not the evaluation and adjustment of long-term targets based on experience.
Did we get there? (Option D):
In this phase, the enterprise evaluates the outcomes of the implemented governance system against the set objectives and targets. It involves assessing whether the desired goals were achieved and analyzing the effectiveness of the governance practices. Based on this evaluation, the organization can adjust long-term targets to better align with practical experience, new insights, and evolving business needs. This phase is critical for continuous improvement and ensuring that the governance system remains relevant and effective over time.
According to the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, this phase includes reviewing performance metrics, stakeholder feedback, and lessons learned from the implementation process. These insights are then used to refine and adjust long-term targets to improve future performance and outcomes.
Conclusion: The correct answer is
D. Did we get there?. This phase involves evaluating the results of the governance implementation, learning from the experience, and making necessary adjustments to long-term targets to ensure continuous improvement and alignment with the enterprise’s goals.
Reference: ISACA. COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide: Implementing and Optimizing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.
ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.
Question #11
Which of the following needs to be resolved when finalizing the initial governance design?
- A . Misaligned enterprise and IT goals
- B . Budgeted versus actual resources
- C . Objectives exceeding enterprise appetite
- D . Conflicting inputs and priorities
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
The initial governance design process involves gathering inputs from various stakeholders, including business units, IT, and external partners. These inputs can sometimes conflict, and it is crucial to resolve these conflicts to create a unified governance system that supports enterprise objectives.
Key Steps:
Stakeholder Alignment: Ensuring that all stakeholders are on the same page regarding priorities and objectives.
Conflict Resolution: Addressing and resolving any discrepancies or conflicts in inputs to ensure a consistent and aligned governance system.
Prioritization: Establishing clear priorities to guide decision-making and resource allocation.
COBIT 2019 Framework
Reference: COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4: Discusses the importance of resolving conflicting inputs and establishing a cohesive governance framework that aligns with enterprise priorities.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives: Emphasizes the need for alignment between IT and enterprise goals, requiring the resolution of any conflicting priorities.
Resolving conflicting inputs and priorities ensures that the governance system is well-aligned and effective in achieving enterprise goals.
D
Explanation:
The initial governance design process involves gathering inputs from various stakeholders, including business units, IT, and external partners. These inputs can sometimes conflict, and it is crucial to resolve these conflicts to create a unified governance system that supports enterprise objectives.
Key Steps:
Stakeholder Alignment: Ensuring that all stakeholders are on the same page regarding priorities and objectives.
Conflict Resolution: Addressing and resolving any discrepancies or conflicts in inputs to ensure a consistent and aligned governance system.
Prioritization: Establishing clear priorities to guide decision-making and resource allocation.
COBIT 2019 Framework
Reference: COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4: Discusses the importance of resolving conflicting inputs and establishing a cohesive governance framework that aligns with enterprise priorities.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives: Emphasizes the need for alignment between IT and enterprise goals, requiring the resolution of any conflicting priorities.
Resolving conflicting inputs and priorities ensures that the governance system is well-aligned and effective in achieving enterprise goals.
Question #12
Who would be identified as an external stakeholder when soliciting feedback on a business case associated with a new system upgrade to satisfy new regulations?
- A . Implementation team
- B . Staff utilizing the solution
- C . IT audit committee
- D . Current IT service vendor
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
When soliciting feedback on a business case associated with a new system upgrade to satisfy new regulations, the current IT service vendor would be identified as an external stakeholder. External stakeholders are those outside the organization who can influence or be influenced by the outcomes of the project.
In the context of COBIT 2019, external stakeholders are those who are not part of the enterprise but have a vested interest in the success of IT initiatives. The current IT service vendor plays a critical role in providing feedback on the feasibility, implementation challenges, and potential impact of the new system upgrade.
COBIT 2019 Framework
Reference: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 7: Highlights the importance of engaging external stakeholders, including vendors, to gain valuable insights and feedback.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives: Emphasizes the need for stakeholder engagement, including both internal and external parties, to ensure comprehensive feedback and alignment with requirements.
Engaging the current IT service vendor as an external stakeholder ensures that all relevant perspectives are considered, enhancing the quality and feasibility of the business case.
D
Explanation:
When soliciting feedback on a business case associated with a new system upgrade to satisfy new regulations, the current IT service vendor would be identified as an external stakeholder. External stakeholders are those outside the organization who can influence or be influenced by the outcomes of the project.
In the context of COBIT 2019, external stakeholders are those who are not part of the enterprise but have a vested interest in the success of IT initiatives. The current IT service vendor plays a critical role in providing feedback on the feasibility, implementation challenges, and potential impact of the new system upgrade.
COBIT 2019 Framework
Reference: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 7: Highlights the importance of engaging external stakeholders, including vendors, to gain valuable insights and feedback.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives: Emphasizes the need for stakeholder engagement, including both internal and external parties, to ensure comprehensive feedback and alignment with requirements.
Engaging the current IT service vendor as an external stakeholder ensures that all relevant perspectives are considered, enhancing the quality and feasibility of the business case.
Question #13
At which stage of the governance system design flow are design factors translated into governance and management priorities?
- A . Concluding the governance system design
- B . Understanding the enterprise strategy
- C . Determining the initial scope
- D . Refining the scope
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
In the COBIT 2019 Governance System Design Workflow, design factors are essential elements that influence the tailoring and implementation of a governance system. These design factors include elements such as enterprise strategy, goals, risk profile, compliance requirements, and more. The stage where these design factors are translated into specific governance and management priorities is during the "Refining the Scope" phase.
Detailed Explanation with
Reference: Concluding the Governance System Design (Option A):
This stage involves finalizing and approving the design of the governance system. By this point, the design factors have already been considered and translated into actionable priorities.
Understanding the Enterprise Strategy (Option B):
At this stage, the focus is on understanding the enterprise’s strategic direction and objectives. While it is crucial to gather this understanding to inform the governance system design, the actual translation of design factors into governance and management priorities occurs later.
Determining the Initial Scope (Option C):
This stage involves setting the preliminary boundaries and focus areas for the governance system. It identifies the broad areas that need governance attention but does not yet translate specific design factors into detailed priorities.
Refining the Scope (Option D):
During this phase, the initial scope is refined based on a deeper analysis of the design factors. It is at this stage that the design factors are critically analyzed and translated into specific governance and management priorities. This phase ensures that the governance system is tailored to the unique needs of the enterprise and aligns with its strategic goals, risk profile, and other key considerations.
According to the COBIT 2019 Design Guide, refining the scope involves using the identified design factors to make informed decisions about where to focus governance efforts and how to prioritize various governance and management activities. This ensures a targeted and effective governance system.
Conclusion: The correct answer is
D. Refining the scope. In this phase, design factors are systematically translated into specific governance and management priorities, ensuring that the governance system is precisely aligned with the enterprise’s needs and objectives.
Reference: ISACA. COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution.
ISACA.
ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.
D
Explanation:
In the COBIT 2019 Governance System Design Workflow, design factors are essential elements that influence the tailoring and implementation of a governance system. These design factors include elements such as enterprise strategy, goals, risk profile, compliance requirements, and more. The stage where these design factors are translated into specific governance and management priorities is during the "Refining the Scope" phase.
Detailed Explanation with
Reference: Concluding the Governance System Design (Option A):
This stage involves finalizing and approving the design of the governance system. By this point, the design factors have already been considered and translated into actionable priorities.
Understanding the Enterprise Strategy (Option B):
At this stage, the focus is on understanding the enterprise’s strategic direction and objectives. While it is crucial to gather this understanding to inform the governance system design, the actual translation of design factors into governance and management priorities occurs later.
Determining the Initial Scope (Option C):
This stage involves setting the preliminary boundaries and focus areas for the governance system. It identifies the broad areas that need governance attention but does not yet translate specific design factors into detailed priorities.
Refining the Scope (Option D):
During this phase, the initial scope is refined based on a deeper analysis of the design factors. It is at this stage that the design factors are critically analyzed and translated into specific governance and management priorities. This phase ensures that the governance system is tailored to the unique needs of the enterprise and aligns with its strategic goals, risk profile, and other key considerations.
According to the COBIT 2019 Design Guide, refining the scope involves using the identified design factors to make informed decisions about where to focus governance efforts and how to prioritize various governance and management activities. This ensures a targeted and effective governance system.
Conclusion: The correct answer is
D. Refining the scope. In this phase, design factors are systematically translated into specific governance and management priorities, ensuring that the governance system is precisely aligned with the enterprise’s needs and objectives.
Reference: ISACA. COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution.
ISACA.
ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.
Question #14
Which of the following situations is MOST likely the root cause for an enterprise lacking the required skills and competencies to execute an EGIT implementation program plan?
- A . Enterprise training does not include business and management skill development.
- B . Business staff are too often involved in IT processes that affect business processes and procedures.
- C . The enterprise relies too heavily on the use of COBIT as its EG IT framework.
- D . IT staff are too often focused on the achievement of business value.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
The most likely root cause for an enterprise lacking the required skills and competencies to execute an EGIT (Enterprise Governance of IT) implementation program plan is that enterprise training does not include business and management skill development. Effective EGIT implementation requires a blend of technical, business, and management skills.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO07 (Managed Human Resources): This objective emphasizes the importance of developing skills and competencies, including business and management skills, for successful governance and management of enterprise IT.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter outlines the need for comprehensive training programs that address not only technical skills but also business and management capabilities to ensure successful implementation of governance frameworks.
Without proper training that includes business and management skills, staff may be ill-prepared to handle the complexities of EGIT implementation, leading to skill gaps and competency issues.
A
Explanation:
The most likely root cause for an enterprise lacking the required skills and competencies to execute an EGIT (Enterprise Governance of IT) implementation program plan is that enterprise training does not include business and management skill development. Effective EGIT implementation requires a blend of technical, business, and management skills.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO07 (Managed Human Resources): This objective emphasizes the importance of developing skills and competencies, including business and management skills, for successful governance and management of enterprise IT.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3: This chapter outlines the need for comprehensive training programs that address not only technical skills but also business and management capabilities to ensure successful implementation of governance frameworks.
Without proper training that includes business and management skills, staff may be ill-prepared to handle the complexities of EGIT implementation, leading to skill gaps and competency issues.
Question #15
Which of the following should be used when translating design factor values into governance and management priorities?
- A . Weighted average
- B . Matrix calculation
- C . Weighted calculation
- D . Pareto analysis
Correct Answer: C
C
Explanation:
When translating design factor values into governance and management priorities, a weighted calculation should be used. This method allows for the consideration of various factors according to their relative importance and impact on the governance system.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4: This chapter explains the process of translating design factor values into actionable governance and management priorities, emphasizing the use of weighted calculations to reflect the importance of different design factors.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4: This chapter highlights how weighted calculations can help prioritize governance and management activities based on the enterprise’s specific context and needs.
Using weighted calculations ensures a balanced and proportionate approach to prioritizing governance and management objectives, leading to a more effective and tailored governance system.
C
Explanation:
When translating design factor values into governance and management priorities, a weighted calculation should be used. This method allows for the consideration of various factors according to their relative importance and impact on the governance system.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4: This chapter explains the process of translating design factor values into actionable governance and management priorities, emphasizing the use of weighted calculations to reflect the importance of different design factors.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4: This chapter highlights how weighted calculations can help prioritize governance and management activities based on the enterprise’s specific context and needs.
Using weighted calculations ensures a balanced and proportionate approach to prioritizing governance and management objectives, leading to a more effective and tailored governance system.
Question #16
Which of the following tools would be MOST useful for measuring and monitoring performance and the realization of benefits from an EGIT implementation program plan project?
- A . IT balanced scorecard
- B . Project management software
- C . Gantt chart
- D . RACI chart
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
The most useful tool for measuring and monitoring performance and the realization of benefits from an EGIT implementation program plan project is the IT balanced scorecard. The balanced scorecard provides a comprehensive view of performance across multiple dimensions, aligning IT objectives with business goals.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, MEA01 (Managed Performance
and Conformance Monitoring): This objective discusses the use of balanced scorecards to monitor
and measure performance effectively.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 5: This chapter highlights the importance of performance measurement tools, including the IT balanced scorecard, for tracking progress and ensuring the realization of benefits from IT governance initiatives.
A
Explanation:
The most useful tool for measuring and monitoring performance and the realization of benefits from an EGIT implementation program plan project is the IT balanced scorecard. The balanced scorecard provides a comprehensive view of performance across multiple dimensions, aligning IT objectives with business goals.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, MEA01 (Managed Performance
and Conformance Monitoring): This objective discusses the use of balanced scorecards to monitor
and measure performance effectively.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 5: This chapter highlights the importance of performance measurement tools, including the IT balanced scorecard, for tracking progress and ensuring the realization of benefits from IT governance initiatives.
Question #17
I&T-related issues should be considered as part of the design factors for a governance system in order to manage:
- A . risks that could materialize.
- B . risks that have already materialized.
- C . risks that have a high probability.
- D . risks that have a high impact.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
I&T-related issues should be considered as part of the design factors for a governance system in order to manage risks that could materialize. This proactive approach allows the enterprise to identify and mitigate potential risks before they occur, enhancing the overall resilience and effectiveness of the governance system.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2: This chapter explains the importance of considering I&T-related issues as design factors to address potential risks that could impact the governance system.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO12 (Managed Risk): This objective emphasizes the need to identify and manage risks that could affect IT and business processes.
By addressing potential risks through the design of the governance system, enterprises can better prepare for and mitigate adverse events, ensuring smoother and more effective IT operations.
A
Explanation:
I&T-related issues should be considered as part of the design factors for a governance system in order to manage risks that could materialize. This proactive approach allows the enterprise to identify and mitigate potential risks before they occur, enhancing the overall resilience and effectiveness of the governance system.
Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2: This chapter explains the importance of considering I&T-related issues as design factors to address potential risks that could impact the governance system.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO12 (Managed Risk): This objective emphasizes the need to identify and manage risks that could affect IT and business processes.
By addressing potential risks through the design of the governance system, enterprises can better prepare for and mitigate adverse events, ensuring smoother and more effective IT operations.
Question #18
Ensuring the program team knows and understands the enterprise goals is a part of which of the following implementation phases?
- A . Where are we now?
- B . Where do we want to be?
- C . How do we get there?
- D . What are the drivers?
Correct Answer: B
B
Explanation:
Ensuring the program team knows and understands the enterprise goals is a part of the "Where do we want to be?" implementation phase. This phase focuses on defining the future state of the enterprise, including its strategic objectives and goals.
In the COBIT 2019 framework, the "Where do we want to be?" phase is dedicated to establishing the vision and future state objectives of the enterprise. During this phase, it is crucial for the program team to fully understand and align with the enterprise goals to ensure that the governance system supports achieving these goals effectively.
COBIT 2019 Framework
Reference: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 4: Outlines the steps in defining the future state, including setting strategic objectives and ensuring that the program team understands the enterprise goals.
COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Emphasizes the importance of aligning the governance system with enterprise goals and objectives.
Ensuring that the program team understands the enterprise goals in this phase is essential for aligning governance practices with strategic objectives, thereby facilitating successful implementation and achievement of desired outcomes.
B
Explanation:
Ensuring the program team knows and understands the enterprise goals is a part of the "Where do we want to be?" implementation phase. This phase focuses on defining the future state of the enterprise, including its strategic objectives and goals.
In the COBIT 2019 framework, the "Where do we want to be?" phase is dedicated to establishing the vision and future state objectives of the enterprise. During this phase, it is crucial for the program team to fully understand and align with the enterprise goals to ensure that the governance system supports achieving these goals effectively.
COBIT 2019 Framework
Reference: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 4: Outlines the steps in defining the future state, including setting strategic objectives and ensuring that the program team understands the enterprise goals.
COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Emphasizes the importance of aligning the governance system with enterprise goals and objectives.
Ensuring that the program team understands the enterprise goals in this phase is essential for aligning governance practices with strategic objectives, thereby facilitating successful implementation and achievement of desired outcomes.
Question #19
Which of the following components should be considered for inclusion when considering the threat landscape design factor?
- A . Compliance and assurance capabilities
- B . Information security focus areas
- C . Information flows including security policy
- D . Impact and probability levels
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
When considering the threat landscape design factor, impact and probability levels should be considered for inclusion. These levels help in assessing the potential consequences and likelihood of various threats, which is essential for effective risk management and governance.
In the COBIT 2019 framework, the threat landscape design factor involves understanding and evaluating the risks that an enterprise may face. Impact and probability levels are critical components of this evaluation as they provide a basis for prioritizing threats and developing appropriate responses.
COBIT 2019 Framework
Reference: COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2: Discusses the importance of understanding the threat landscape and evaluating threats based on their impact and probability.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives: Emphasizes the need for a thorough risk assessment, which includes analyzing the impact and probability of potential threats.
Including impact and probability levels in the assessment of the threat landscape ensures a comprehensive understanding of risks, enabling the enterprise to prioritize and mitigate threats effectively.
D
Explanation:
When considering the threat landscape design factor, impact and probability levels should be considered for inclusion. These levels help in assessing the potential consequences and likelihood of various threats, which is essential for effective risk management and governance.
In the COBIT 2019 framework, the threat landscape design factor involves understanding and evaluating the risks that an enterprise may face. Impact and probability levels are critical components of this evaluation as they provide a basis for prioritizing threats and developing appropriate responses.
COBIT 2019 Framework
Reference: COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2: Discusses the importance of understanding the threat landscape and evaluating threats based on their impact and probability.
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives: Emphasizes the need for a thorough risk assessment, which includes analyzing the impact and probability of potential threats.
Including impact and probability levels in the assessment of the threat landscape ensures a comprehensive understanding of risks, enabling the enterprise to prioritize and mitigate threats effectively.
Question #20
Under which circumstances should an enterprise consider the implementation of a strong compliance function as part of their governance system?
- A . When the enterprise is subject to substantially higher than average compliance regulations because itis operating in a heavily regulated industry sector
- B . Under all circumstances, because every enterprise is subject to compliance regulations
- C . When the enterprise is operating in a high-threat landscape because of its geopolitical situation
- D . When the enterprise has a strict set of policies and procedures in place
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
An enterprise should consider the implementation of a strong compliance function as part of their governance system when it is subject to substantially higher than average compliance regulations because it is operating in a heavily regulated industry sector.
In COBIT 2019, the need for a strong compliance function is influenced by the regulatory environment in which the enterprise operates. Enterprises in heavily regulated industries face stringent compliance requirements and significant consequences for non-compliance. Therefore, a robust compliance function is essential to ensure adherence to regulations and to mitigate compliance-related risks.
COBIT 2019 Framework
Reference: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 5: Discusses the importance of compliance requirements as a design factor in tailoring the governance system.
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2: Highlights the role of compliance and assurance capabilities in highly regulated industries.
Implementing a strong compliance function in such scenarios helps the enterprise manage regulatory risks, maintain compliance, and avoid legal and financial penalties.
A
Explanation:
An enterprise should consider the implementation of a strong compliance function as part of their governance system when it is subject to substantially higher than average compliance regulations because it is operating in a heavily regulated industry sector.
In COBIT 2019, the need for a strong compliance function is influenced by the regulatory environment in which the enterprise operates. Enterprises in heavily regulated industries face stringent compliance requirements and significant consequences for non-compliance. Therefore, a robust compliance function is essential to ensure adherence to regulations and to mitigate compliance-related risks.
COBIT 2019 Framework
Reference: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 5: Discusses the importance of compliance requirements as a design factor in tailoring the governance system.
COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2: Highlights the role of compliance and assurance capabilities in highly regulated industries.
Implementing a strong compliance function in such scenarios helps the enterprise manage regulatory risks, maintain compliance, and avoid legal and financial penalties.