How should the lack of provision of a fire escape from the upstairs of the building in Timebox B initially be dealt with?

How should the lack of provision of a fire escape from the upstairs of the building in Timebox B initially be dealt with?
A . The Solution Development Team should revise the Timebox Plans for Timeboxes B and C.
B . The Solution Development Team should commence understanding and delivering the new requirement.
C . The Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator, should escalate the issue to Architecture Angels’ Senior Management Team.
D . The Project Manager should escalate the issue to the Marketing Director, who is in the role of Business Visionary.

View Answer

Answer: C

Explanation:

The initial action to deal with the lack of provision of a fire escape from the upstairs of the building in Timebox B should be:

• C. The Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator, should escalate the issue to Architecture Angels’ Senior Management Team.

This is because the lack of a fire escape is a significant safety concern that could have legal and regulatory implications. It’s important that the Senior Management Team is aware of this issue so they can make informed decisions about how to address it. The Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator, is well-positioned to understand the technical implications of this issue and communicate them to the Senior Management Team.

While revising the Timebox Plans (option A) or commencing understanding and delivering the new requirement (option B) could be part of the solution, these actions should be taken after the issue has been escalated and discussed with the Senior Management Team. Escalating the issue to the Marketing Director (option D) may not be the most effective course of action, as this is primarily a technical and safety issue, not a marketing one.