Exam4Training

How do you address this requirement?

XYZ Corporation wants to ensure that every attempt by a developer to check a rule into a certain ruleset version is reviewed before that rule is allowed to be checked in. The rule should be automatically sent back to the developer without being checked in if all warnings are not justified and the fields on the history tab are not complete.

How do you address this requirement?
A . Prior to the first assignment in the ApproveRuleCheckin flow, add a decision shape where one output connector is equivalent to the submitting the SendBack flow action.
B . Implement a CheckForCustomWarnings activity for each rule included in the requirement. The activity issues a warning whenever the requirement’s history tab criteria are not met.
C . Override the FindReviewers decision tree to invoke a when rule that evaluates the criteria, if the when rule returns true, the decision tree returns SendBack.
D . Override the SendBack Flow Action adding a pre-ctivity that transfers the assignment to
the create operator if the rule’s criteria are not met.

Answer: A

Exit mobile version