Hank’s pre-contractual assurance is most likely to be an example of which of the following?

Cleveland Insurance (Cleveland) offers a range of insurance services. The main software used in the call centre is a customer relationship management (CRM) system. Cleveland perceived an urgent need to replace the existing CRM system to deal with the increasing number of customers and services.

Urgent Digital Ltd (Digital) is one of the bidders of Cleveland’s ITT. Its bid team is led by Hank Irvine, its technical director. Hank realises that winning the Cleveland contract (valued at approximately £50M) will enhance his career. During discussions with Cleveland, Hank offers certain assurances regarding timescales for the project. He has not carried out any investigations into the viability of the timescales. Hank has little idea whether the timescales can be met.

Cleveland decides that Digital’s bid meets with its requirements, especially given the assurances in timescale offered by Hank, and decides to proceed with it, subject to a formal contract. Eventually, a formal contract is signed by both parties. The initial assurances given by Hank about the timing of the project are never going to be achieved

and are at best grossly exaggerated.

Hank’s pre-contractual assurance is most likely to be an example of which of the following?
A . Inaccuracy in communication
B. Threat
C. Initial impossibility
D. Fraudulent misrepresentation

View Answer

Answer: C

Explanation:

Hank’s pre-contractual assurances may amount to misrepresentation. Fraudulent misrepresentation is a strong possibility since Hank had carried out no investigations into the viability of the project timescales. This could amount to recklessness in using information without taking any steps to see if it is true or not.

The scenario above was constructed based on the case BSkyB v EDS, a famous case in IT sector.

LO 1, AC 1.2