Fortinet NSE7_EFW-7.0 Fortinet NSE 7 – Enterprise Firewall 7.0 Online Training
Fortinet NSE7_EFW-7.0 Online Training
The questions for NSE7_EFW-7.0 were last updated at Jan 05,2025.
- Exam Code: NSE7_EFW-7.0
- Exam Name: Fortinet NSE 7 - Enterprise Firewall 7.0
- Certification Provider: Fortinet
- Latest update: Jan 05,2025
Examine the output from the ‘diagnose debug authd fsso list’ command; then answer the question below.
# diagnose debug authd fsso list ―FSSO logons-IP: 192.168.3.1 User: STUDENT Groups: TRAININGAD/USERS Workstation: INTERNAL2. TRAINING. LAB The IP address 192.168.3.1 is NOT the one used by the workstation INTERNAL2. TRAINING. LAB.
What should the administrator check?
- A . The IP address recorded in the logon event for the user STUDENT.
- B . The DNS name resolution for the workstation name INTERNAL2. TRAINING. LAB.
- C . The source IP address of the traffic arriving to the FortiGate from the workstation INTERNAL2. TRAINING. LAB.
- D . The reserve DNS lookup for the IP address 192.168.3.1.
Refer to the exhibits, which show the configuration on FortiGate and partial session information for internet traffic from a user on the internal network.
If the priority on route ID 2 were changed from 10 to 0, what would happen to traffic matching that user session?
- A . The session would remain in the session table, but its traffic would now egress from
both port1 and port2. - B . The session would remain in the session table, and its traffic would egress from port2.
- C . The session would be deleted, and the client would need to start a new session.
- D . The session would remain in the session table, and its traffic would egress from port1.
D
Explanation:
https://community.fortinet.com/t5/FortiGate/Technical-Tip-Using-SNAT-route-change-to-update-existing-NAT/ta-p/198439
Which two conditions would prevent a static route from being added to the routing table? (Choose two.)
- A . There is another other route to the same destination, with a lower distance.
- B . The route has a lower priority value than another route to the same destination.
- C . The next-hop IP address is unreachable.
- D . The interface specified in the route configuration is down
A,D
Explanation:
The routing table contains only the static route with the lowest distance https://community.fortinet.com/t5/FortiGate/Technical-Note-Routing-behavior-depending-on-distance-and/ta-p/198221
Refer to the exhibit, which contains partial outputs from two routing debug commands.
Why is the port2 default route not in the second command’s output?
- A . It has a higher priority value than the default route using port1.
- B . It is disabled in the FortiGate configuration.
- C . It has a lower priority value than the default route using port1.
- D . It has a higher distance than the default route using port1.
View the exhibit, which contains the output of a web diagnose command, and then answer the question below.
Which one of the following statements explains why the cache statistics are all zeros?
- A . The administrator has reallocated the cache memory to a separate process.
- B . There are no users making web requests.
- C . The FortiGuard web filter cache is disabled in the FortiGate’s configuration.
- D . FortiGate is using a flow-based web filter and the cache applies only to proxy-based inspection.
What is the diagnose test application ipsmenitor 5 command used for?
- A . To enable IPS bypass mode
- B . To disable the IPS engine
- C . To restart all IPS engines and monitors
- D . To provide information regarding IPS sessions
A
Explanation:
# diagnose test application ipsmonitor
5: Toggle bypass status
13: IPS session list
98: Stop all IPS engines
99: Restart all IPS engines and monitor
View the exhibit, which contains the output of a real-time debug, Which statement about this output is true?
Which of the following statements is true regarding this output?
- A . The requested URL belongs to category ID 255.
- B . The server hostname Is training, fortinet.com.
- C . FortiGate found the requested URL in its local cache.
- D . This web request was inspected using the ftgd-allow web filler profile.
C
Explanation:
Example log for no local cache case: #id=93000 msg="pid=57 urlfilter_main-723 in main.c received pkt:count=91 "IPS and WAD will only send request to urlfilter daemon when cache is missed. " So the WAD process by itself found the URL rating in the local cache and didn`t ask for help from the URL process as in the example.
What does the dirty flag mean in a FortiGate session configured for NGFW policy mode?
- A . The existing session table entry has been updated with the app_id and the firewall policy table needs to be checked for a match.
- B . The application or URL category is unknown and needs to be rescanned by the IPS engine to try to identify the Layer 7 details.
- C . The URL category for this session has been updated by FortiGuard and the session needs to be checked against the policy again to ensure proper web filtering is applied.
- D . Traffic has been identified as coming from an application that is not allowed and the relevant replacement message needs to be displayed to the user, if configured.
A
Explanation:
Enterprise_Firewall_7.0_Study_Guide-Online.pdf p 99
View the following FortiGate configuration.
All traffic to the Internet currently egresses from port1.
The exhibit shows partial session information for Internet traffic from a user on the internal network:
If the priority on route ID 1 were changed from 5 to 20, what would happen to traffic matching that user’s session?
- A . The session would remain in the session table, and its traffic would still egress from port1.
- B . The session would remain in the session table, but its traffic would now egress from both port1 and port2.
- C . The session would remain in the session table, and its traffic would start to egress from port2.
- D . The session would be deleted, so the client would need to start a new session.
A
Explanation:
http://kb.fortinet.com/kb/documentLink.do?externalID=FD40943
Refer to the exhibit, which shows a FortiGate configuration.
An administrator is troubleshooting a web filter issue on FortiGate. The administrator has configured a web filter profile and applied it to a policy; however, the web filter is not inspecting any traffic that is passing through the policy.
What must the administrator change to fix the issue?
- A . Increase webfilter-timeout.
- B . Change protocol to TCP.
- C . Enable fortiguard-anycast.
- D . Disable webfilter-force-off.
D
Explanation:
Reference: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/6.4.5/cli-reference/109620/config-system-fortiguard
Latest NSE7_EFW-7.0 Dumps Valid Version with 115 Q&As
Latest And Valid Q&A | Instant Download | Once Fail, Full Refund
