Does this meet the goal?
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You have a Power BI report that imports a date table and a sales table from an Azure SQL database data source.
The sales table has the following date foreign keys:
✑ Due Date
✑ Order Date
✑ Delivery Date
You need to support the analysis of sales over time based on all the date foreign keys.
Solution: For each date foreign key, you add inactive relationships between the sales table and the date table.
Does this meet the goal?
A . Yes
B. No
Answer: B
Explanation:
You can reference an inactive relationship whit DAX function
USERELATIONSHIP(), but using DAX is not mentioned here.
So follow this refactory methodology:
Create a copy of the role-playing table, providing it with a name that reflects its role. If it’s an Import table, we recommend defining a calculated table. If it’s a DirectQuery table, you can duplicate the Power Query query.
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/guidance/relationships-active-inactive
Latest PL-300 Dumps Valid Version with 131 Q&As
Latest And Valid Q&A | Instant Download | Once Fail, Full Refund