CORRECT TEXT

Six months have passed. Wodd has announced its intention to create a biomass power

station in its North Forest, to be fuelled by trees from the North Forest itself and also waste biomass products from other timber land owned by Wodd in that area.

The news has received mixed reactions. Younger residents of the small towns close to North Forest were delighted because their local economy will be boosted. Older residents and those living further afield within the region complain that the power station will pollute the environment and the destruction of the North Forest will blight an area of outstanding beauty. A residents’ group has been established online, with support from Marland’s largest environmental lobbying group, to block the proposal.

You have received the following email from Marcus Svenson, Finance Director:

From: Marcus Svenson, Finance Director

To: Senior Finance Manager

Subject: Stakeholder issues

Hi,

I have sent you a link to the website created by the protestors against the biomass power station. This is causing serious problems because we still need to gain formal Government approval, although the Government supports biomass as an energy source as it is far cleaner and more sustainable than fossil fuel and far less controversial than nuclear. Needless to say, the press has picked up on this and is starting to run the story.

We had reached agreements in principle with Marland Bank for funding for this project and with a civil engineering contractor for the construction work, but both are now nervous about signing contracts because neither wishes to be associated with an environmental scandal.

I need two things from you.

Please draft the body of a press release that we can issue in response to the claims on the protestors’ website. Add a few comments to explain what your arguments are trying to achieve (I don’t want us simply to state that we disagree with the protestors, I want us to offer meaningful arguments in response). Just write your draft as part of your reply to this email and I will circulate it to the other Board members for approval before we submit it.

Please suggest some safeguards that we can put in place to enable us to retain the support of the bank and the civil engineer throughout this project.

Marcus

Reveal Solution Hide Solution

CORRECT TEXT

Four weeks have passed since your encounter with the Chairman. The directors of both companies were informed of the proposal to merge two weeks ago and the public was informed two days ago.

You have received the following email from Marcus Svenson, Finance Director:

From: Marcus Svenson, Finance Director

To: Senior Finance Manager

Subject: Merger negotiations

Hi,

Please see the attached table and also a comment that I downloaded from a Wodd shareholder’s blog, showing the market capitalisations for Wodd and Darrell both before and after the merger announcement.

If I am reading this correctly, it would appear that we are suffering at the hands of Darrell because the market believes that it is getting more of the benefit from the merger. This is before the terms of the merger have even been announced.

I need you to do two things:

Please draft a formal response to Market Blogger’s post. We will insert this into his blog as a formal response from Wodd’s Board and we will also email it to all shareholders.

Please draft an outline strategy for negotiating with Darrell’s Board. Clearly, I want Wodd’s shareholders to get the best possible deal out of this merger.

Marcus

Reference Material:

Reveal Solution Hide Solution

CORRECT TEXT

You have received the following email from Peter Sorchi, CEO:

From: Peter Sorchi, Chief Executive Officer

To: Senior Finance Manager

Fwd: Tax avoidance article

Hi,

I am forwarding you an email from a journalist. It came in via our press office, who passed it up the management chain and it ended up in my inbox.

Some of the basic facts stated in the draft article are correct:

We do have arrangements in place with leading tax advisers for referrals of potential clients. We pay a commission for all such referrals, which the tax adviser is required to disclose to the client.

Barry Crauder has been one of our largest clients for many years. He owns significant forested land and we manage that in return for our usual fee.

We do not offer tax advice, or promote forestry as a tax-efficient investment. We simply offer a forestry management service as a paid service.

I would like you to address the following issues and I need your reply as a matter of some urgency.

Could we be accused of behaving unethically with respect to this aspect of our forestry management service?

Please draft a response that we can submit to Sonia Jones. Please also give an explanation for the Board as to how you will address the fact that the draft newspaper article clearly makes us appear to be unethical. We will consider your draft and related comments at a meeting this afternoon, before submitting anything.

Peter

To: Press Office, Wodd

From: Sonia Jones, reporter, Daily Gazette

Re: Tax avoidance article

I am seeking a response from Wodd concerning the activities of the celebrity Barry

Crauder. We have established that Mr Crauder has been investing heavily in forestry in order to avoid paying tax on the considerable wealth that he has amassed from his show business career.

We believe that a significant part of this story is the relationship between forestry companies such as Wodd and professional tax advisers. When researching this story I posed as a wealthy investor and approached several firms that specialise in offering tax avoidance advice to high net worth individuals. Four of the firms whom I approached recommended a forestry scheme and specifically recommended Wodd to manage it for me. I believe that Wodd has a close relationship with these firms and possibly others.

I have attached a draft of my story. I have sufficient evidence to support every fact stated. I am writing in order to give Wodd the opportunity to respond if it wishes to do so, although the story will run regardless. I will require your comment within 48 hours, otherwise, I will run the story as it stands.

Sonia Jones

Chief reporter, Daily Gazette

Reveal Solution Hide Solution

CORRECT TEXT

Newsweb

Protesters block bulldozers

Attempts by Wodd to harvest some of the hardwood trees from their newly acquired Bravadorian forest suffered a further setback yesterday.

Wodd’s bulldozers have been unable to make any headway in clearing the site for the company’s first logging base because environmental groups from several countries have descended on the Bravadorian jungle to protest the proposed destruction of the forest and the associated harvesting of many rare hardwood trees. Protestors have chained themselves to trees and to heavy equipment, making it impossible to commence the clearance operations.

Wodd’s problems have been compounded by the recent discovery that a tribe of forest dwellers has lived in the forest for many generations, making little or no contact with the outside world in the process. The tribe is effectively nomadic, moving from one part of the forest to another, surviving by hunting game and gathering edible vegetation and relocating when food starts to become scarce. The environmental protestors claim that Wodd’s activities will make it impossible for this tribe to continue with its traditional way of life.

Wodd claims to adhere to The Forestry Stewardship Council of Marland’s ten principles, which include the assurance that "The legal and customary rights of indigenous peoples to own, use and manage their lands, territories, and resources shall be recognized and respected."

Reference Material:

Reveal Solution Hide Solution

CORRECT TEXT

You have received the following email from Marcus Svenson, Finance Director:

From: Marcus Svenson, Finance Director

To: Senior Finance Manager

Subject: News reports

Hi,

I have sent you a link to a news site on the internet. Things are getting complicated in Bravador.

Every Board member has been asked to attend a brainstorming session this afternoon, before the CEO flies out to Bravador this evening. We will be considering the following four matters:

Is it acceptable for us to develop this forest, given the commitment that we have made with respect to indigenous peoples’ rights? They have been quoted at the end of the news article.

Is it fair for the environmental protestors to complain that our operations are unsustainable?

Would it be unethical to offer to build a village, with a proper school and medical clinic, for the tribe and to offer them work in our forestry operations?

Is it really a good idea for the CEO to fly to Bravador just to appear on the television news in his boots and overalls?

Please email me your thoughts on each of these matters before I leave for the meeting this afternoon.

Marcus

Reveal Solution Hide Solution