Question #1
A global customer has end users who input date and currency data into fields in inconsistent formats. Despite continued training efforts, this continues to be an issue. Unfortunately, the third-party service that the end users are using does not support forcing a required field format. These input mistakes do not happen frequently, but they currently stop the scenario from executing after the default three retries.
In Fusion, which action can the admin take to ensure that errors are corrected after they occur in a scenario?
- A . Select storing of Incomplete Executions in the scenario settings. The customer admin can then filter and search the execution history to resolve errors as they occur.
- B . Use the switch module to catch dates not in the required format and convert the common misused patterns into the appropriate format to prevent the scenario from stopping after three failed executions.
- C . Set up an error handling path that will catch errors in the end user’s inputs and message the users in an email update that they need to try again.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Scenario:
The issue involves end users inputting inconsistent date and currency formats that result in errors in a Workfront Fusion scenario.
The default behavior of Fusion stops the scenario after three retries due to input mismatches or invalid formats.
Why Option A is Correct:
Storing Incomplete Executions: In Adobe Workfront Fusion, enabling "Store incomplete executions" in the scenario settings allows administrators to capture incomplete runs without fully stopping the entire process. This feature stores all relevant data, even from incomplete runs, allowing administrators to identify and correct input issues manually.
Error Troubleshooting: By reviewing incomplete executions, admins can pinpoint where the scenario failed, resolve the issue, and potentially reprocess those incomplete records, preventing complete scenario stoppage.
Why Option B is Incorrect:
The "switch module" can handle specific input variations, but it is not a comprehensive solution for handling unexpected or inconsistent formats entered by end users. While it might mitigate some errors, it does not address the root cause and can miss unanticipated input patterns.
Why Option C is Incorrect:
Setting up an error handling path to notify users and request corrections adds an additional manual step for users but does not resolve the problem efficiently within Fusion. Moreover, this solution does not prevent the scenario from halting after retries.
Steps to Enable Storing Incomplete Executions:
Navigate to the scenario in Adobe Workfront Fusion.
Open the Scenario Settings by clicking the gear icon.
Enable the option Store Incomplete Executions under Execution settings.
Save the settings and activate the scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
Enabling this setting ensures that no data is lost when the scenario fails due to inconsistent inputs. Admins can access the incomplete executions through the scenario execution history, apply necessary corrections, and retry specific records or steps as needed. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Scenario Settings
Workfront Community: Handling Incomplete Executions
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Scenario:
The issue involves end users inputting inconsistent date and currency formats that result in errors in a Workfront Fusion scenario.
The default behavior of Fusion stops the scenario after three retries due to input mismatches or invalid formats.
Why Option A is Correct:
Storing Incomplete Executions: In Adobe Workfront Fusion, enabling "Store incomplete executions" in the scenario settings allows administrators to capture incomplete runs without fully stopping the entire process. This feature stores all relevant data, even from incomplete runs, allowing administrators to identify and correct input issues manually.
Error Troubleshooting: By reviewing incomplete executions, admins can pinpoint where the scenario failed, resolve the issue, and potentially reprocess those incomplete records, preventing complete scenario stoppage.
Why Option B is Incorrect:
The "switch module" can handle specific input variations, but it is not a comprehensive solution for handling unexpected or inconsistent formats entered by end users. While it might mitigate some errors, it does not address the root cause and can miss unanticipated input patterns.
Why Option C is Incorrect:
Setting up an error handling path to notify users and request corrections adds an additional manual step for users but does not resolve the problem efficiently within Fusion. Moreover, this solution does not prevent the scenario from halting after retries.
Steps to Enable Storing Incomplete Executions:
Navigate to the scenario in Adobe Workfront Fusion.
Open the Scenario Settings by clicking the gear icon.
Enable the option Store Incomplete Executions under Execution settings.
Save the settings and activate the scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
Enabling this setting ensures that no data is lost when the scenario fails due to inconsistent inputs. Admins can access the incomplete executions through the scenario execution history, apply necessary corrections, and retry specific records or steps as needed. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Scenario Settings
Workfront Community: Handling Incomplete Executions
Question #2
A solution requested for a use case requires that the scenario is initiated with project updates.
Which Workfront app module will start the scenario immediately?
- A . Watch Events
- B . Watch Record
- C . Watch Field
- D . Search
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Question:
The scenario must begin as soon as a project update occurs in Adobe Workfront.
The correct Workfront module should continuously monitor for specific changes (in this case, project
updates) and trigger the scenario immediately.
Why Option A ("Watch Events") is Correct:
Watch Events Module: This module in Adobe Workfront Fusion is specifically designed to monitor events, such as updates to projects, tasks, or issues, and trigger scenarios as soon as those events occur.
Real-Time Triggering: The "Watch Events" module listens to the Workfront event stream and ensures the scenario starts immediately upon detecting relevant updates.
Example Use Case: Monitoring updates to a project’s status, such as changes in "Completion" or "Progress," to trigger notifications or integrations with other systems.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option B ("Watch Record"): This module monitors specific Workfront records (e.g., projects, tasks, issues) for new additions or modifications, but it does not initiate scenarios immediately when updates occur. It works better for periodic checks rather than real-time events.
Option C ("Watch Field"): This module monitors changes to specific fields within a Workfront object, but it is not designed for broader event monitoring like project updates. It is more suited for field-specific tracking.
Option D ("Search"): This module performs queries to find specific data in Workfront (e.g., searching for projects based on criteria), but it is not an event-driven module and does not automatically trigger scenarios.
Steps to Configure the Watch Events Module in Workfront Fusion:
In the Fusion scenario editor, add the Watch Events module as the first step in your scenario.
Configure the module:
Select Workfront Connection: Choose the authorized Workfront account.
Event Object: Specify the object type (e.g., Project, Task, Issue) to monitor.
Event Type: Select the type of event to watch, such as "Update" or "Change."
Save and activate the scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
Using the Watch Events module ensures the scenario is event-driven and starts automatically when
the desired project update occurs. This approach is both efficient and timely, meeting the
requirement for immediate initiation.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Watch Events Module
Workfront Community Forum: Use Cases for Watch Events
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Question:
The scenario must begin as soon as a project update occurs in Adobe Workfront.
The correct Workfront module should continuously monitor for specific changes (in this case, project
updates) and trigger the scenario immediately.
Why Option A ("Watch Events") is Correct:
Watch Events Module: This module in Adobe Workfront Fusion is specifically designed to monitor events, such as updates to projects, tasks, or issues, and trigger scenarios as soon as those events occur.
Real-Time Triggering: The "Watch Events" module listens to the Workfront event stream and ensures the scenario starts immediately upon detecting relevant updates.
Example Use Case: Monitoring updates to a project’s status, such as changes in "Completion" or "Progress," to trigger notifications or integrations with other systems.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option B ("Watch Record"): This module monitors specific Workfront records (e.g., projects, tasks, issues) for new additions or modifications, but it does not initiate scenarios immediately when updates occur. It works better for periodic checks rather than real-time events.
Option C ("Watch Field"): This module monitors changes to specific fields within a Workfront object, but it is not designed for broader event monitoring like project updates. It is more suited for field-specific tracking.
Option D ("Search"): This module performs queries to find specific data in Workfront (e.g., searching for projects based on criteria), but it is not an event-driven module and does not automatically trigger scenarios.
Steps to Configure the Watch Events Module in Workfront Fusion:
In the Fusion scenario editor, add the Watch Events module as the first step in your scenario.
Configure the module:
Select Workfront Connection: Choose the authorized Workfront account.
Event Object: Specify the object type (e.g., Project, Task, Issue) to monitor.
Event Type: Select the type of event to watch, such as "Update" or "Change."
Save and activate the scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
Using the Watch Events module ensures the scenario is event-driven and starts automatically when
the desired project update occurs. This approach is both efficient and timely, meeting the
requirement for immediate initiation.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Watch Events Module
Workfront Community Forum: Use Cases for Watch Events
Question #3
A user needs to dynamically create custom form field options in two customer environments.
Given this image, which type of Workfront module is referenced in the formula with the parameterlD value?
- A . Custom API Call
- B . Misc Action
- C . Read Related Records
- D . Search
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Image and Context:
The image provided represents an HTTP module in Workfront Fusion with a URL that dynamically references various data points (e.g., parameterID, customer.domain, emailAddr).
The structure of the URL indicates a call to the Workfront API (/api/v1.0/), using parameters to pass dynamic data such as parameterID, username, and password.
Why Option A ("Custom API Call") is Correct:
The HTTP module shown in the image is a custom API call because it interacts with Workfront’s API endpoints by passing dynamic parameters through the URL.
Custom API Call modules allow users to manually configure requests to endpoints in cases where no predefined Workfront Fusion module exists for the operation. This is evident in the example, where specific fields like parameterID, customer.domain, and others are manually mapped to the API URL.
Example Use Case: Dynamically creating custom form field options by sending a POST/PUT request to the Workfront API with specific parameters (like label and value) for each environment.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option B ("Misc Action"): This refers to predefined actions in Workfront Fusion for handling simple tasks. The HTTP module is not categorized under Misc Actions as it involves direct API interaction. Option C ("Read Related Records"): This module is used to fetch data related to Workfront objects (e.g., related tasks or documents). It doesn’t allow dynamic parameter passing or URL customization as seen here.
Option D ("Search"): The Search module is used for querying Workfront objects based on specific criteria but does not involve making direct API calls or sending HTTP requests with custom parameters.
Steps to Configure a Custom API Call in Workfront Fusion:
Add the HTTP Module to your scenario.
Select the appropriate HTTP method (e.g., GET, POST, PUT). In this case, a POST or PUT method would be used to create or update custom form fields.
Enter the API endpoint in the URL field, as shown in the image.
Map dynamic values to the parameters by referencing fields from previous modules in the scenario.
For instance:
customer.domain: Extracted from prior steps.
parameterID, label, and value: Dynamically passed based on input data.
Authenticate the request using a username and password or an API token.
Test the module to ensure the API call works as expected.
How This Solves the Problem:
By using a Custom API Call (via the HTTP module), the user can dynamically interact with the Workfront API to create or modify custom form field options across multiple customer environments, passing the required parameters programmatically. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion HTTP Module Documentation
Workfront API Documentation
Workfront Fusion Community Forum: Using HTTP Module for API Calls
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Image and Context:
The image provided represents an HTTP module in Workfront Fusion with a URL that dynamically references various data points (e.g., parameterID, customer.domain, emailAddr).
The structure of the URL indicates a call to the Workfront API (/api/v1.0/), using parameters to pass dynamic data such as parameterID, username, and password.
Why Option A ("Custom API Call") is Correct:
The HTTP module shown in the image is a custom API call because it interacts with Workfront’s API endpoints by passing dynamic parameters through the URL.
Custom API Call modules allow users to manually configure requests to endpoints in cases where no predefined Workfront Fusion module exists for the operation. This is evident in the example, where specific fields like parameterID, customer.domain, and others are manually mapped to the API URL.
Example Use Case: Dynamically creating custom form field options by sending a POST/PUT request to the Workfront API with specific parameters (like label and value) for each environment.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option B ("Misc Action"): This refers to predefined actions in Workfront Fusion for handling simple tasks. The HTTP module is not categorized under Misc Actions as it involves direct API interaction. Option C ("Read Related Records"): This module is used to fetch data related to Workfront objects (e.g., related tasks or documents). It doesn’t allow dynamic parameter passing or URL customization as seen here.
Option D ("Search"): The Search module is used for querying Workfront objects based on specific criteria but does not involve making direct API calls or sending HTTP requests with custom parameters.
Steps to Configure a Custom API Call in Workfront Fusion:
Add the HTTP Module to your scenario.
Select the appropriate HTTP method (e.g., GET, POST, PUT). In this case, a POST or PUT method would be used to create or update custom form fields.
Enter the API endpoint in the URL field, as shown in the image.
Map dynamic values to the parameters by referencing fields from previous modules in the scenario.
For instance:
customer.domain: Extracted from prior steps.
parameterID, label, and value: Dynamically passed based on input data.
Authenticate the request using a username and password or an API token.
Test the module to ensure the API call works as expected.
How This Solves the Problem:
By using a Custom API Call (via the HTTP module), the user can dynamically interact with the Workfront API to create or modify custom form field options across multiple customer environments, passing the required parameters programmatically. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion HTTP Module Documentation
Workfront API Documentation
Workfront Fusion Community Forum: Using HTTP Module for API Calls
Question #4
Given this Fusion scenario, a user needs to access multiple fields from the Workfront module for mapped expressions in the HTTP PUT requests.
Which action should the user take?
- A . Set Multiple Variables module after the Workfront module. Get Multiple Variables between the Text Parser and the bottom Router.
- B . Set Multiple Variables module after the Workfront module. Get Variable modules just before each HTTP module for the specific variables needed in each bottom path.
- C . Set Variable module after the Workfront module. Get Variable modules just before each HTTP module in the bottom paths.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Scenario:
The image represents a Workfront Fusion scenario with a Workfront module, HTTP modules, and routers splitting the execution path.
The goal is to reuse multiple fields from the Workfront module (e.g., data extracted or processed earlier in the flow) as mapped expressions in HTTP PUT requests located in the bottom paths.
Why Option A is Correct:
Set Multiple Variables Module: This module allows you to define and store multiple variables at a single point in the scenario (e.g., after the Workfront module). These variables can then be reused throughout subsequent steps in the scenario.
Get Multiple Variables Module: By placing this module between the Text Parser and the bottom Router, you can retrieve all previously stored variables, ensuring consistent access across all branches of the flow. This avoids redundancy and ensures the data is easily accessible for each HTTP request in
the bottom paths.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option B ("Set Multiple Variables after Workfront, Get Variables before each HTTP module"): This is partially correct but less efficient. Adding multiple Get Variable modules before each HTTP request results in repetitive configuration and increases maintenance complexity.
Option C ("Set Variable and Get Variable for each HTTP module"): Using individual Set and Get Variable modules increases duplication. This approach requires separate variables for each data point, which is inefficient compared to using the Set/Get Multiple Variables module for multiple fields at once.
Steps to Configure the Solution:
After the Workfront module:
Add a Set Multiple Variables module.
Define all the fields required for the HTTP PUT requests as variables, mapping them from the Workfront module outputs.
Between the Text Parser and the bottom Router:
Add a Get Multiple Variables module.
Retrieve the previously stored variables, ensuring they are accessible for all paths.
In the HTTP modules on each bottom path:
Use the retrieved variables for mapping in the PUT requests.
How This Solves the Problem:
This approach centralizes variable management, making it easier to access and modify data as needed.
It avoids redundancy, as variables are defined once and reused across all paths, reducing the risk of
errors and ensuring consistency.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion: Variables Module Overview
Workfront Community: Efficient Use of Variables in Fusion
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Scenario:
The image represents a Workfront Fusion scenario with a Workfront module, HTTP modules, and routers splitting the execution path.
The goal is to reuse multiple fields from the Workfront module (e.g., data extracted or processed earlier in the flow) as mapped expressions in HTTP PUT requests located in the bottom paths.
Why Option A is Correct:
Set Multiple Variables Module: This module allows you to define and store multiple variables at a single point in the scenario (e.g., after the Workfront module). These variables can then be reused throughout subsequent steps in the scenario.
Get Multiple Variables Module: By placing this module between the Text Parser and the bottom Router, you can retrieve all previously stored variables, ensuring consistent access across all branches of the flow. This avoids redundancy and ensures the data is easily accessible for each HTTP request in
the bottom paths.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option B ("Set Multiple Variables after Workfront, Get Variables before each HTTP module"): This is partially correct but less efficient. Adding multiple Get Variable modules before each HTTP request results in repetitive configuration and increases maintenance complexity.
Option C ("Set Variable and Get Variable for each HTTP module"): Using individual Set and Get Variable modules increases duplication. This approach requires separate variables for each data point, which is inefficient compared to using the Set/Get Multiple Variables module for multiple fields at once.
Steps to Configure the Solution:
After the Workfront module:
Add a Set Multiple Variables module.
Define all the fields required for the HTTP PUT requests as variables, mapping them from the Workfront module outputs.
Between the Text Parser and the bottom Router:
Add a Get Multiple Variables module.
Retrieve the previously stored variables, ensuring they are accessible for all paths.
In the HTTP modules on each bottom path:
Use the retrieved variables for mapping in the PUT requests.
How This Solves the Problem:
This approach centralizes variable management, making it easier to access and modify data as needed.
It avoids redundancy, as variables are defined once and reused across all paths, reducing the risk of
errors and ensuring consistency.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion: Variables Module Overview
Workfront Community: Efficient Use of Variables in Fusion
Question #5
In a scenario that searches for recently completed tasks, a user notices the following input and output for a date transformation.
Input: March 3, 2021 10:34 AM Output: March 1, 2021 10:34 AM
Which expression produces this date transformation?
- A . subDays(now,2)
- B . addHours(now; -48)
- C . addDays(today; -4)
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Date Transformation:
Input: March 3, 2021, 10:34 AM
Output: March 1, 2021, 10:34 AM
The transformation subtracts 2 days from the input date without altering the time.
Why Option A is Correct:
subDays(now,2) subtracts exactly 2 days from the given date and time.
It preserves the time component of the input (10:34 AM) while shifting the date backward by 2 days,
which matches the given output.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option B ("addHours(now; -48)"): While subtracting 48 hours also results in a 2-day difference, this approach directly modifies the time. The resulting time could shift if the operation crosses daylight saving changes or edge cases with leap seconds. It is less reliable compared to subDays.
Option C ("addDays(today; -4)"): This would subtract 4 days, which does not match the transformation shown in the example.
Reference and Supporting Documentation: Adobe Workfront Fusion: Date and Time Functions Workfront Community: Using Date and Time Expressions
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Date Transformation:
Input: March 3, 2021, 10:34 AM
Output: March 1, 2021, 10:34 AM
The transformation subtracts 2 days from the input date without altering the time.
Why Option A is Correct:
subDays(now,2) subtracts exactly 2 days from the given date and time.
It preserves the time component of the input (10:34 AM) while shifting the date backward by 2 days,
which matches the given output.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option B ("addHours(now; -48)"): While subtracting 48 hours also results in a 2-day difference, this approach directly modifies the time. The resulting time could shift if the operation crosses daylight saving changes or edge cases with leap seconds. It is less reliable compared to subDays.
Option C ("addDays(today; -4)"): This would subtract 4 days, which does not match the transformation shown in the example.
Reference and Supporting Documentation: Adobe Workfront Fusion: Date and Time Functions Workfront Community: Using Date and Time Expressions
Question #6
In scenario settings, which two fields can be adjusted to affect how a scenario is executed once running? (Choose two.)
- A . Number of consecutive errors
- B . Max number of cycles
- C . Number of bundles per run
- D . Number of consecutive runs
Correct Answer: AB
AB
Explanation:
Key Scenario Settings:
Adobe Workfront Fusion provides settings to control the execution of scenarios. These settings
impact how the scenario behaves when it runs, especially under conditions such as errors or long-
running processes.
Explanation of Correct Options:
Option A ("Number of consecutive errors"):
This setting determines the maximum number of consecutive errors allowed before the scenario execution halts.
By adjusting this value, users can define how resilient the scenario is to temporary failures in
modules or external systems.
Option B ("Max number of cycles"):
This setting limits the maximum number of cycles (iterations) the scenario performs in a single run. It prevents scenarios from running indefinitely or consuming excessive resources in cases of large datasets.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option C ("Number of bundles per run"): This value is not adjustable in the scenario settings. Instead, the system dynamically determines how many bundles (data packets) are processed per cycle. Option D ("Number of consecutive runs"): Workfront Fusion does not have a setting for the number of consecutive runs. Scenarios are executed based on schedules, triggers, or manual execution.
Steps to Adjust Scenario Settings:
Open the scenario in Adobe Workfront Fusion.
Click the gear icon in the top-right corner to access Scenario Settings.
Locate and adjust the following fields:
Number of consecutive errors: Set a value based on acceptable failure tolerance.
Max number of cycles: Specify the maximum number of iterations allowed.
Save and activate the scenario.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Scenario Settings
Workfront Community: Best Practices for Scenario Optimization
AB
Explanation:
Key Scenario Settings:
Adobe Workfront Fusion provides settings to control the execution of scenarios. These settings
impact how the scenario behaves when it runs, especially under conditions such as errors or long-
running processes.
Explanation of Correct Options:
Option A ("Number of consecutive errors"):
This setting determines the maximum number of consecutive errors allowed before the scenario execution halts.
By adjusting this value, users can define how resilient the scenario is to temporary failures in
modules or external systems.
Option B ("Max number of cycles"):
This setting limits the maximum number of cycles (iterations) the scenario performs in a single run. It prevents scenarios from running indefinitely or consuming excessive resources in cases of large datasets.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option C ("Number of bundles per run"): This value is not adjustable in the scenario settings. Instead, the system dynamically determines how many bundles (data packets) are processed per cycle. Option D ("Number of consecutive runs"): Workfront Fusion does not have a setting for the number of consecutive runs. Scenarios are executed based on schedules, triggers, or manual execution.
Steps to Adjust Scenario Settings:
Open the scenario in Adobe Workfront Fusion.
Click the gear icon in the top-right corner to access Scenario Settings.
Locate and adjust the following fields:
Number of consecutive errors: Set a value based on acceptable failure tolerance.
Max number of cycles: Specify the maximum number of iterations allowed.
Save and activate the scenario.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Scenario Settings
Workfront Community: Best Practices for Scenario Optimization
Question #7
A user notices that all task due dates for an organization are in the wrong time zone.
What is the simplest way to change the time zone so that it applies to all dates used in the organization’s scenarios?
- A . Set a variable for every date in the scenario that formats the date to the desired time zone by using the formatDate function
- B . Change the Fusion organization’s time zone
- C . Change the scenario’s time zone default
- D . Change the time zone in the computer’s localization settings
Correct Answer: B
B
Explanation:
Understanding the Issue:
The user observes that all task due dates are incorrect due to a mismatch in the time zone.
The solution must ensure that the correct time zone is applied universally across all scenarios and
dates within the organization’s Fusion instance.
Why Option B is Correct:
Fusion Organization’s Time Zone Setting:
Changing the time zone at the organization level ensures that all scenarios within the organization adopt the updated time zone setting.
This change applies globally, making it the simplest and most efficient method to ensure consistency across all dates and scenarios.
This adjustment prevents the need for scenario-specific or localized changes, saving time and reducing errors.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Set a variable for every date using formatDate"):
While the formatDate function can adjust time zones for individual dates, applying this approach to every date in every scenario is highly inefficient and error-prone. It does not offer a global solution. Option C ("Change the scenario’s time zone default"):
Scenarios in Fusion do not have a specific "time zone default" setting. The organization’s time zone setting is the controlling factor.
Option D ("Change the time zone in the computer’s localization settings"):
Fusion scenarios run on cloud servers, not the user’s local machine. Changing the computer’s time zone would have no effect on the scenarios’ behavior. Steps to Change the Organization’s Time Zone:
Log in to Adobe Workfront Fusion.
Navigate to the Organization Settings:
Go to the Admin Panel or the organization settings section.
Locate the Time Zone setting.
Select the desired time zone from the dropdown list.
Save the changes.
All scenarios will now adopt the updated time zone setting.
How This Solves the Problem:
Changing the organization’s time zone applies a consistent time zone across all dates used in scenarios. This ensures accuracy without requiring individual scenario adjustments or manual interventions.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Organization Settings
Workfront Community: Best Practices for Time Zone Configuration
B
Explanation:
Understanding the Issue:
The user observes that all task due dates are incorrect due to a mismatch in the time zone.
The solution must ensure that the correct time zone is applied universally across all scenarios and
dates within the organization’s Fusion instance.
Why Option B is Correct:
Fusion Organization’s Time Zone Setting:
Changing the time zone at the organization level ensures that all scenarios within the organization adopt the updated time zone setting.
This change applies globally, making it the simplest and most efficient method to ensure consistency across all dates and scenarios.
This adjustment prevents the need for scenario-specific or localized changes, saving time and reducing errors.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Set a variable for every date using formatDate"):
While the formatDate function can adjust time zones for individual dates, applying this approach to every date in every scenario is highly inefficient and error-prone. It does not offer a global solution. Option C ("Change the scenario’s time zone default"):
Scenarios in Fusion do not have a specific "time zone default" setting. The organization’s time zone setting is the controlling factor.
Option D ("Change the time zone in the computer’s localization settings"):
Fusion scenarios run on cloud servers, not the user’s local machine. Changing the computer’s time zone would have no effect on the scenarios’ behavior. Steps to Change the Organization’s Time Zone:
Log in to Adobe Workfront Fusion.
Navigate to the Organization Settings:
Go to the Admin Panel or the organization settings section.
Locate the Time Zone setting.
Select the desired time zone from the dropdown list.
Save the changes.
All scenarios will now adopt the updated time zone setting.
How This Solves the Problem:
Changing the organization’s time zone applies a consistent time zone across all dates used in scenarios. This ensures accuracy without requiring individual scenario adjustments or manual interventions.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Organization Settings
Workfront Community: Best Practices for Time Zone Configuration
Question #8
Which action in Fusion enables resource sharing, such as connections, data stores, and keys?
- A . Create a new group
- B . Create a new team
- C . Create a new organization
Correct Answer: B
B
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The user wants to enable resource sharing in Fusion, including connections, data stores, and keys.
Resource sharing is necessary to allow multiple scenarios or users to access shared resources
efficiently within the same Fusion environment.
Why Option B ("Create a new team") is Correct:
Teams in Fusion:
Teams are a feature in Adobe Workfront Fusion designed to group users together within an organization.
By creating a team, you can enable shared access to resources such as API connections, data stores, and authentication keys, streamlining collaboration and avoiding duplication. Resource Sharing with Teams:
All members of the team can access shared resources (e.g., connections), allowing consistent and collaborative scenario development and execution.
Example: If multiple users within a team need to use the same API connection, creating a team allows the connection to be configured once and shared among all team members.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Create a new group"):
Groups in Fusion are used primarily for organizing scenarios or categorizing users but do not inherently allow sharing of resources like connections or keys. Groups lack the resource-sharing functionality of teams.
Option C ("Create a new organization"):
Organizations in Fusion represent the highest-level administrative entity. While creating an organization allows resource sharing among all users within the organization, it is not the recommended solution for managing resource sharing in smaller or more focused groups, such as project teams.
Steps to Create a New Team and Share Resources:
Log in to Adobe Workfront Fusion.
Navigate to the Admin Panel or Team Management section.
Select Create a New Team and provide a name for the team.
Assign users to the team by adding their Fusion accounts.
Configure shared resources (e.g., connections, data stores, keys) to be accessible by the team.
Save the settings, and all team members will now have access to the shared resources.
How This Solves the Problem:
Creating a team ensures that all resources, such as connections, data stores, and keys, are accessible to team members without requiring individual duplication or configuration. It simplifies collaboration and promotes consistency across scenarios. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion: Teams Overview
Workfront Community: Managing Teams and Resource Sharing
B
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The user wants to enable resource sharing in Fusion, including connections, data stores, and keys.
Resource sharing is necessary to allow multiple scenarios or users to access shared resources
efficiently within the same Fusion environment.
Why Option B ("Create a new team") is Correct:
Teams in Fusion:
Teams are a feature in Adobe Workfront Fusion designed to group users together within an organization.
By creating a team, you can enable shared access to resources such as API connections, data stores, and authentication keys, streamlining collaboration and avoiding duplication. Resource Sharing with Teams:
All members of the team can access shared resources (e.g., connections), allowing consistent and collaborative scenario development and execution.
Example: If multiple users within a team need to use the same API connection, creating a team allows the connection to be configured once and shared among all team members.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Create a new group"):
Groups in Fusion are used primarily for organizing scenarios or categorizing users but do not inherently allow sharing of resources like connections or keys. Groups lack the resource-sharing functionality of teams.
Option C ("Create a new organization"):
Organizations in Fusion represent the highest-level administrative entity. While creating an organization allows resource sharing among all users within the organization, it is not the recommended solution for managing resource sharing in smaller or more focused groups, such as project teams.
Steps to Create a New Team and Share Resources:
Log in to Adobe Workfront Fusion.
Navigate to the Admin Panel or Team Management section.
Select Create a New Team and provide a name for the team.
Assign users to the team by adding their Fusion accounts.
Configure shared resources (e.g., connections, data stores, keys) to be accessible by the team.
Save the settings, and all team members will now have access to the shared resources.
How This Solves the Problem:
Creating a team ensures that all resources, such as connections, data stores, and keys, are accessible to team members without requiring individual duplication or configuration. It simplifies collaboration and promotes consistency across scenarios. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion: Teams Overview
Workfront Community: Managing Teams and Resource Sharing
Question #9
What two module outputs does a user receive from this expression? (Choose two.)
- A . Non-empty array
- B . An empty field
- C . Text value’No Type"
- D . Collections comma separated
Correct Answer: A, C
A, C
Explanation:
Understanding the Expression:
The provided expression uses the ifempty function:
ifempty(2.data:types[]; "No Type")
Structure of the Expression:
The first parameter, 2.data:types[], is an array being checked for content.
The second parameter, "No Type", is the fallback value returned if the array is empty or undefined.
Purpose of ifempty: This function checks if the given value is empty or undefined. If the value is not empty, it returns the value. If the value is empty, it returns the fallback text ("No Type"). Expected Module Outputs:
A, C
Explanation:
Understanding the Expression:
The provided expression uses the ifempty function:
ifempty(2.data:types[]; "No Type")
Structure of the Expression:
The first parameter, 2.data:types[], is an array being checked for content.
The second parameter, "No Type", is the fallback value returned if the array is empty or undefined.
Purpose of ifempty: This function checks if the given value is empty or undefined. If the value is not empty, it returns the value. If the value is empty, it returns the fallback text ("No Type"). Expected Module Outputs:
Question #10
In a Fusion scenario, a new project in Workfront will trigger the creation of a new project in ServiceNow. The name of the project in ServiceNow will be constructed in the following format: Two Digit Year – Reference Number – Project Name.
Which expression will generate the correct string?
- A . formatDate(now;YY) – referenceNumber – name
- B . join(formatDate(now;YY) – referenceNumber – name)
- C . concat(formatDate(now;YY) – referenceNumber – name)
Correct Answer: C
C
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The desired output format for the project name in ServiceNow is:
Two-Digit Year – Reference Number – Project Name
This requires dynamically constructing a string by combining:
The current year in a two-digit format.
The referenceNumber (a variable or input).
The name (a variable or input, likely the project name).
Why Option C is Correct:
The concat function combines multiple strings into a single string.
Expression:
concat(formatDate(now;YY), " – ", referenceNumber, " – ", name)
This ensures proper formatting with hyphens and spaces between the elements.
Breaking Down the Components:
formatDate(now;YY): Retrieves the current year in a two-digit format (e.g., "23" for 2023).
" – ": Adds the required separator.
referenceNumber: Dynamically adds the reference number.
name: Dynamically adds the project name.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("formatDate(now;YY) – referenceNumber – name"):
This is not valid because it does not explicitly use a string concatenation function.
Option B ("join(formatDate(now;YY) – referenceNumber – name"):
The join function is used for concatenating elements of an array, not individual strings. Since the inputs are not in an array, this function will not work.
How This Solves the Problem:
The concat function correctly constructs the string with the desired format, dynamically generating the project name for ServiceNow based on the given inputs. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Functions Documentation
Workfront Community: Using the concat Function
C
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The desired output format for the project name in ServiceNow is:
Two-Digit Year – Reference Number – Project Name
This requires dynamically constructing a string by combining:
The current year in a two-digit format.
The referenceNumber (a variable or input).
The name (a variable or input, likely the project name).
Why Option C is Correct:
The concat function combines multiple strings into a single string.
Expression:
concat(formatDate(now;YY), " – ", referenceNumber, " – ", name)
This ensures proper formatting with hyphens and spaces between the elements.
Breaking Down the Components:
formatDate(now;YY): Retrieves the current year in a two-digit format (e.g., "23" for 2023).
" – ": Adds the required separator.
referenceNumber: Dynamically adds the reference number.
name: Dynamically adds the project name.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("formatDate(now;YY) – referenceNumber – name"):
This is not valid because it does not explicitly use a string concatenation function.
Option B ("join(formatDate(now;YY) – referenceNumber – name"):
The join function is used for concatenating elements of an array, not individual strings. Since the inputs are not in an array, this function will not work.
How This Solves the Problem:
The concat function correctly constructs the string with the desired format, dynamically generating the project name for ServiceNow based on the given inputs. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Functions Documentation
Workfront Community: Using the concat Function
Question #11
A query returns a partial list of possible values.
Which flow control module should be used to ensure all the possible results are queried?
- A . Aggregator
- B . Repeater
- C . Iterator
- D . Router
Correct Answer: B
B
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The query returns only a partial list of possible values.
The task is to ensure that all results are processed by iterating through multiple queries or pages of data.
Why Option B ("Repeater") is Correct:
The Repeater module is designed to repeat an operation a specified number of times or until a condition is met.
It is commonly used for querying paginated data or when a system limits the number of records returned in a single request.
In this case, the Repeater ensures all possible values are queried by making additional requests to
retrieve subsequent pages or results.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Aggregator"):
The Aggregator combines multiple data bundles into a single output. It does not handle iterative
queries or pagination.
Option C ("Iterator"):
The Iterator splits an array into individual items for processing. It does not handle querying for
additional data or looping through requests.
Option D ("Router"):
The Router splits the flow of a scenario into multiple paths based on conditions. It is unrelated to iterative querying.
Steps to Configure the Repeater:
Add the Repeater module to your scenario.
Configure the number of repetitions or the condition to continue querying (e.g., based on the presence of additional data).
Link the Repeater to the module responsible for retrieving the data, ensuring it processes all available results.
How This Solves the Problem:
The Repeater module ensures that all possible results are queried by iteratively sending requests until no more data is available.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion: Repeater Module Documentation
Workfront Community: Using Flow Control Modules
B
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The query returns only a partial list of possible values.
The task is to ensure that all results are processed by iterating through multiple queries or pages of data.
Why Option B ("Repeater") is Correct:
The Repeater module is designed to repeat an operation a specified number of times or until a condition is met.
It is commonly used for querying paginated data or when a system limits the number of records returned in a single request.
In this case, the Repeater ensures all possible values are queried by making additional requests to
retrieve subsequent pages or results.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Aggregator"):
The Aggregator combines multiple data bundles into a single output. It does not handle iterative
queries or pagination.
Option C ("Iterator"):
The Iterator splits an array into individual items for processing. It does not handle querying for
additional data or looping through requests.
Option D ("Router"):
The Router splits the flow of a scenario into multiple paths based on conditions. It is unrelated to iterative querying.
Steps to Configure the Repeater:
Add the Repeater module to your scenario.
Configure the number of repetitions or the condition to continue querying (e.g., based on the presence of additional data).
Link the Repeater to the module responsible for retrieving the data, ensuring it processes all available results.
How This Solves the Problem:
The Repeater module ensures that all possible results are queried by iteratively sending requests until no more data is available.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion: Repeater Module Documentation
Workfront Community: Using Flow Control Modules
Question #12
Data coming from a third-party system contains a field that needs to be transformed into one of three possible choices.
Which function supports this transformation?
- A . Switch
- B . Slice
- C . Split
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The field data from a third-party system needs to be transformed into one of three possible choices. This transformation implies conditional logic, where the output depends on the value of the input field.
Why Option A ("Switch") is Correct:
The Switch function evaluates a given input against multiple cases and outputs a corresponding value based on the matched condition.
For example:
switch(field, "value1", "choice1", "value2", "choice2", "defaultChoice")
If field equals "value1", the output is "choice1".
If field equals "value2", the output is "choice2".
If no conditions match, the output is "defaultChoice".
This functionality perfectly fits the requirement to transform the input into one of three possible choices.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option B ("Slice"):
The slice function is used for extracting a portion of a string or array but does not support conditional
transformations.
Option C ("Split"):
The split function divides a string into an array based on a specified delimiter. It is not designed for
conditional logic or value mapping.
How This Solves the Problem:
The Switch function allows flexible and dynamic transformations, ensuring the field data is mapped
to the correct choice based on its value.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Functions Documentation
Workfront Community: Using the Switch Function for Conditional Logic
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The field data from a third-party system needs to be transformed into one of three possible choices. This transformation implies conditional logic, where the output depends on the value of the input field.
Why Option A ("Switch") is Correct:
The Switch function evaluates a given input against multiple cases and outputs a corresponding value based on the matched condition.
For example:
switch(field, "value1", "choice1", "value2", "choice2", "defaultChoice")
If field equals "value1", the output is "choice1".
If field equals "value2", the output is "choice2".
If no conditions match, the output is "defaultChoice".
This functionality perfectly fits the requirement to transform the input into one of three possible choices.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option B ("Slice"):
The slice function is used for extracting a portion of a string or array but does not support conditional
transformations.
Option C ("Split"):
The split function divides a string into an array based on a specified delimiter. It is not designed for
conditional logic or value mapping.
How This Solves the Problem:
The Switch function allows flexible and dynamic transformations, ensuring the field data is mapped
to the correct choice based on its value.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Functions Documentation
Workfront Community: Using the Switch Function for Conditional Logic
Question #13
A Fusion user is developing a scenario. The first half of the scenario needs to be tested for consistency. No additional actions are to be executed.
Which control module is required to disable the execution of subsequent modules?
- A . Router
- B . Sleep
- C . Ignore
- D . Break
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The user wants to test the first half of the scenario for consistency without executing the remaining modules.
This requires halting further execution after a specific point in the scenario.
Why Option D ("Break") is Correct:
The Break module is a flow control module in Adobe Workfront Fusion that stops the execution of all subsequent modules in the scenario.
It is specifically designed for scenarios where you want to terminate execution after testing or processing a portion of the flow.
Example Use Case: After ensuring the first set of modules processes data correctly, the Break module
prevents the execution of later modules to avoid unintended actions or changes.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Router"):
The Router splits the execution flow into multiple branches but does not stop the execution of
subsequent modules.
Option B ("Sleep"):
The Sleep module pauses execution for a specified time but does not disable subsequent modules
permanently.
Option C ("Ignore"):
There is no "Ignore" module in Workfront Fusion.
Steps to Use the Break Module:
Insert the Break module at the point where you want to stop execution.
Save and run the scenario to test the flow up to the Break module.
Once satisfied with the results, remove or bypass the Break module to continue testing or finalizing the full scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
The Break module allows targeted testing of specific sections of the scenario while preventing unwanted execution of subsequent actions, making it a safe and efficient way to debug workflows. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Flow Control Modules Documentation Workfront Community: Using the Break Module in Scenario Development
D
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The user wants to test the first half of the scenario for consistency without executing the remaining modules.
This requires halting further execution after a specific point in the scenario.
Why Option D ("Break") is Correct:
The Break module is a flow control module in Adobe Workfront Fusion that stops the execution of all subsequent modules in the scenario.
It is specifically designed for scenarios where you want to terminate execution after testing or processing a portion of the flow.
Example Use Case: After ensuring the first set of modules processes data correctly, the Break module
prevents the execution of later modules to avoid unintended actions or changes.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Router"):
The Router splits the execution flow into multiple branches but does not stop the execution of
subsequent modules.
Option B ("Sleep"):
The Sleep module pauses execution for a specified time but does not disable subsequent modules
permanently.
Option C ("Ignore"):
There is no "Ignore" module in Workfront Fusion.
Steps to Use the Break Module:
Insert the Break module at the point where you want to stop execution.
Save and run the scenario to test the flow up to the Break module.
Once satisfied with the results, remove or bypass the Break module to continue testing or finalizing the full scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
The Break module allows targeted testing of specific sections of the scenario while preventing unwanted execution of subsequent actions, making it a safe and efficient way to debug workflows. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Flow Control Modules Documentation Workfront Community: Using the Break Module in Scenario Development
Question #13
A Fusion user is developing a scenario. The first half of the scenario needs to be tested for consistency. No additional actions are to be executed.
Which control module is required to disable the execution of subsequent modules?
- A . Router
- B . Sleep
- C . Ignore
- D . Break
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The user wants to test the first half of the scenario for consistency without executing the remaining modules.
This requires halting further execution after a specific point in the scenario.
Why Option D ("Break") is Correct:
The Break module is a flow control module in Adobe Workfront Fusion that stops the execution of all subsequent modules in the scenario.
It is specifically designed for scenarios where you want to terminate execution after testing or processing a portion of the flow.
Example Use Case: After ensuring the first set of modules processes data correctly, the Break module
prevents the execution of later modules to avoid unintended actions or changes.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Router"):
The Router splits the execution flow into multiple branches but does not stop the execution of
subsequent modules.
Option B ("Sleep"):
The Sleep module pauses execution for a specified time but does not disable subsequent modules
permanently.
Option C ("Ignore"):
There is no "Ignore" module in Workfront Fusion.
Steps to Use the Break Module:
Insert the Break module at the point where you want to stop execution.
Save and run the scenario to test the flow up to the Break module.
Once satisfied with the results, remove or bypass the Break module to continue testing or finalizing the full scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
The Break module allows targeted testing of specific sections of the scenario while preventing unwanted execution of subsequent actions, making it a safe and efficient way to debug workflows. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Flow Control Modules Documentation Workfront Community: Using the Break Module in Scenario Development
D
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The user wants to test the first half of the scenario for consistency without executing the remaining modules.
This requires halting further execution after a specific point in the scenario.
Why Option D ("Break") is Correct:
The Break module is a flow control module in Adobe Workfront Fusion that stops the execution of all subsequent modules in the scenario.
It is specifically designed for scenarios where you want to terminate execution after testing or processing a portion of the flow.
Example Use Case: After ensuring the first set of modules processes data correctly, the Break module
prevents the execution of later modules to avoid unintended actions or changes.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Router"):
The Router splits the execution flow into multiple branches but does not stop the execution of
subsequent modules.
Option B ("Sleep"):
The Sleep module pauses execution for a specified time but does not disable subsequent modules
permanently.
Option C ("Ignore"):
There is no "Ignore" module in Workfront Fusion.
Steps to Use the Break Module:
Insert the Break module at the point where you want to stop execution.
Save and run the scenario to test the flow up to the Break module.
Once satisfied with the results, remove or bypass the Break module to continue testing or finalizing the full scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
The Break module allows targeted testing of specific sections of the scenario while preventing unwanted execution of subsequent actions, making it a safe and efficient way to debug workflows. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Flow Control Modules Documentation Workfront Community: Using the Break Module in Scenario Development
Question #13
A Fusion user is developing a scenario. The first half of the scenario needs to be tested for consistency. No additional actions are to be executed.
Which control module is required to disable the execution of subsequent modules?
- A . Router
- B . Sleep
- C . Ignore
- D . Break
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The user wants to test the first half of the scenario for consistency without executing the remaining modules.
This requires halting further execution after a specific point in the scenario.
Why Option D ("Break") is Correct:
The Break module is a flow control module in Adobe Workfront Fusion that stops the execution of all subsequent modules in the scenario.
It is specifically designed for scenarios where you want to terminate execution after testing or processing a portion of the flow.
Example Use Case: After ensuring the first set of modules processes data correctly, the Break module
prevents the execution of later modules to avoid unintended actions or changes.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Router"):
The Router splits the execution flow into multiple branches but does not stop the execution of
subsequent modules.
Option B ("Sleep"):
The Sleep module pauses execution for a specified time but does not disable subsequent modules
permanently.
Option C ("Ignore"):
There is no "Ignore" module in Workfront Fusion.
Steps to Use the Break Module:
Insert the Break module at the point where you want to stop execution.
Save and run the scenario to test the flow up to the Break module.
Once satisfied with the results, remove or bypass the Break module to continue testing or finalizing the full scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
The Break module allows targeted testing of specific sections of the scenario while preventing unwanted execution of subsequent actions, making it a safe and efficient way to debug workflows. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Flow Control Modules Documentation Workfront Community: Using the Break Module in Scenario Development
D
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The user wants to test the first half of the scenario for consistency without executing the remaining modules.
This requires halting further execution after a specific point in the scenario.
Why Option D ("Break") is Correct:
The Break module is a flow control module in Adobe Workfront Fusion that stops the execution of all subsequent modules in the scenario.
It is specifically designed for scenarios where you want to terminate execution after testing or processing a portion of the flow.
Example Use Case: After ensuring the first set of modules processes data correctly, the Break module
prevents the execution of later modules to avoid unintended actions or changes.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Router"):
The Router splits the execution flow into multiple branches but does not stop the execution of
subsequent modules.
Option B ("Sleep"):
The Sleep module pauses execution for a specified time but does not disable subsequent modules
permanently.
Option C ("Ignore"):
There is no "Ignore" module in Workfront Fusion.
Steps to Use the Break Module:
Insert the Break module at the point where you want to stop execution.
Save and run the scenario to test the flow up to the Break module.
Once satisfied with the results, remove or bypass the Break module to continue testing or finalizing the full scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
The Break module allows targeted testing of specific sections of the scenario while preventing unwanted execution of subsequent actions, making it a safe and efficient way to debug workflows. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Flow Control Modules Documentation Workfront Community: Using the Break Module in Scenario Development
Question #13
A Fusion user is developing a scenario. The first half of the scenario needs to be tested for consistency. No additional actions are to be executed.
Which control module is required to disable the execution of subsequent modules?
- A . Router
- B . Sleep
- C . Ignore
- D . Break
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The user wants to test the first half of the scenario for consistency without executing the remaining modules.
This requires halting further execution after a specific point in the scenario.
Why Option D ("Break") is Correct:
The Break module is a flow control module in Adobe Workfront Fusion that stops the execution of all subsequent modules in the scenario.
It is specifically designed for scenarios where you want to terminate execution after testing or processing a portion of the flow.
Example Use Case: After ensuring the first set of modules processes data correctly, the Break module
prevents the execution of later modules to avoid unintended actions or changes.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Router"):
The Router splits the execution flow into multiple branches but does not stop the execution of
subsequent modules.
Option B ("Sleep"):
The Sleep module pauses execution for a specified time but does not disable subsequent modules
permanently.
Option C ("Ignore"):
There is no "Ignore" module in Workfront Fusion.
Steps to Use the Break Module:
Insert the Break module at the point where you want to stop execution.
Save and run the scenario to test the flow up to the Break module.
Once satisfied with the results, remove or bypass the Break module to continue testing or finalizing the full scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
The Break module allows targeted testing of specific sections of the scenario while preventing unwanted execution of subsequent actions, making it a safe and efficient way to debug workflows. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Flow Control Modules Documentation Workfront Community: Using the Break Module in Scenario Development
D
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The user wants to test the first half of the scenario for consistency without executing the remaining modules.
This requires halting further execution after a specific point in the scenario.
Why Option D ("Break") is Correct:
The Break module is a flow control module in Adobe Workfront Fusion that stops the execution of all subsequent modules in the scenario.
It is specifically designed for scenarios where you want to terminate execution after testing or processing a portion of the flow.
Example Use Case: After ensuring the first set of modules processes data correctly, the Break module
prevents the execution of later modules to avoid unintended actions or changes.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Router"):
The Router splits the execution flow into multiple branches but does not stop the execution of
subsequent modules.
Option B ("Sleep"):
The Sleep module pauses execution for a specified time but does not disable subsequent modules
permanently.
Option C ("Ignore"):
There is no "Ignore" module in Workfront Fusion.
Steps to Use the Break Module:
Insert the Break module at the point where you want to stop execution.
Save and run the scenario to test the flow up to the Break module.
Once satisfied with the results, remove or bypass the Break module to continue testing or finalizing the full scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
The Break module allows targeted testing of specific sections of the scenario while preventing unwanted execution of subsequent actions, making it a safe and efficient way to debug workflows. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Flow Control Modules Documentation Workfront Community: Using the Break Module in Scenario Development
Question #13
A Fusion user is developing a scenario. The first half of the scenario needs to be tested for consistency. No additional actions are to be executed.
Which control module is required to disable the execution of subsequent modules?
- A . Router
- B . Sleep
- C . Ignore
- D . Break
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The user wants to test the first half of the scenario for consistency without executing the remaining modules.
This requires halting further execution after a specific point in the scenario.
Why Option D ("Break") is Correct:
The Break module is a flow control module in Adobe Workfront Fusion that stops the execution of all subsequent modules in the scenario.
It is specifically designed for scenarios where you want to terminate execution after testing or processing a portion of the flow.
Example Use Case: After ensuring the first set of modules processes data correctly, the Break module
prevents the execution of later modules to avoid unintended actions or changes.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Router"):
The Router splits the execution flow into multiple branches but does not stop the execution of
subsequent modules.
Option B ("Sleep"):
The Sleep module pauses execution for a specified time but does not disable subsequent modules
permanently.
Option C ("Ignore"):
There is no "Ignore" module in Workfront Fusion.
Steps to Use the Break Module:
Insert the Break module at the point where you want to stop execution.
Save and run the scenario to test the flow up to the Break module.
Once satisfied with the results, remove or bypass the Break module to continue testing or finalizing the full scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
The Break module allows targeted testing of specific sections of the scenario while preventing unwanted execution of subsequent actions, making it a safe and efficient way to debug workflows. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Flow Control Modules Documentation Workfront Community: Using the Break Module in Scenario Development
D
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The user wants to test the first half of the scenario for consistency without executing the remaining modules.
This requires halting further execution after a specific point in the scenario.
Why Option D ("Break") is Correct:
The Break module is a flow control module in Adobe Workfront Fusion that stops the execution of all subsequent modules in the scenario.
It is specifically designed for scenarios where you want to terminate execution after testing or processing a portion of the flow.
Example Use Case: After ensuring the first set of modules processes data correctly, the Break module
prevents the execution of later modules to avoid unintended actions or changes.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Router"):
The Router splits the execution flow into multiple branches but does not stop the execution of
subsequent modules.
Option B ("Sleep"):
The Sleep module pauses execution for a specified time but does not disable subsequent modules
permanently.
Option C ("Ignore"):
There is no "Ignore" module in Workfront Fusion.
Steps to Use the Break Module:
Insert the Break module at the point where you want to stop execution.
Save and run the scenario to test the flow up to the Break module.
Once satisfied with the results, remove or bypass the Break module to continue testing or finalizing the full scenario.
How This Solves the Problem:
The Break module allows targeted testing of specific sections of the scenario while preventing unwanted execution of subsequent actions, making it a safe and efficient way to debug workflows. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Flow Control Modules Documentation Workfront Community: Using the Break Module in Scenario Development
Question #18
If a discount was given, include the Discount% and the Approver’s Last Name.
Ex. 2837 – Compendium-Premium Running Shoes – 21 /02/16 -15% Discount – UserLast
Which expression below represents the project name that the customer wants?
A)
B)
C)
D)
- A . Option A
- B . Option B
- C . Option C
- D . Option D
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The project name in Workfront must include:
Purchase Order Number (PO#).
Name of the product.
PO Fulfillment Date (formatted as YY/MM/DD).
If a discount is provided, append the discount percentage and the approver’s last name in the
format: 15% Discount – UserLast.
Example Output:
sql
Copy
2837 – Compendium-Premium Running Shoes – 21/02/16 – 15% Discount – UserLast
Why Option A is Correct:
The expression in Option A achieves the desired result step-by-step:
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The project name in Workfront must include:
Purchase Order Number (PO#).
Name of the product.
PO Fulfillment Date (formatted as YY/MM/DD).
If a discount is provided, append the discount percentage and the approver’s last name in the
format: 15% Discount – UserLast.
Example Output:
sql
Copy
2837 – Compendium-Premium Running Shoes – 21/02/16 – 15% Discount – UserLast
Why Option A is Correct:
The expression in Option A achieves the desired result step-by-step:
Question #18
If a discount was given, include the Discount% and the Approver’s Last Name.
Ex. 2837 – Compendium-Premium Running Shoes – 21 /02/16 -15% Discount – UserLast
Which expression below represents the project name that the customer wants?
A)
B)
C)
D)
- A . Option A
- B . Option B
- C . Option C
- D . Option D
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The project name in Workfront must include:
Purchase Order Number (PO#).
Name of the product.
PO Fulfillment Date (formatted as YY/MM/DD).
If a discount is provided, append the discount percentage and the approver’s last name in the
format: 15% Discount – UserLast.
Example Output:
sql
Copy
2837 – Compendium-Premium Running Shoes – 21/02/16 – 15% Discount – UserLast
Why Option A is Correct:
The expression in Option A achieves the desired result step-by-step:
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The project name in Workfront must include:
Purchase Order Number (PO#).
Name of the product.
PO Fulfillment Date (formatted as YY/MM/DD).
If a discount is provided, append the discount percentage and the approver’s last name in the
format: 15% Discount – UserLast.
Example Output:
sql
Copy
2837 – Compendium-Premium Running Shoes – 21/02/16 – 15% Discount – UserLast
Why Option A is Correct:
The expression in Option A achieves the desired result step-by-step:
Question #18
If a discount was given, include the Discount% and the Approver’s Last Name.
Ex. 2837 – Compendium-Premium Running Shoes – 21 /02/16 -15% Discount – UserLast
Which expression below represents the project name that the customer wants?
A)
B)
C)
D)
- A . Option A
- B . Option B
- C . Option C
- D . Option D
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The project name in Workfront must include:
Purchase Order Number (PO#).
Name of the product.
PO Fulfillment Date (formatted as YY/MM/DD).
If a discount is provided, append the discount percentage and the approver’s last name in the
format: 15% Discount – UserLast.
Example Output:
sql
Copy
2837 – Compendium-Premium Running Shoes – 21/02/16 – 15% Discount – UserLast
Why Option A is Correct:
The expression in Option A achieves the desired result step-by-step:
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The project name in Workfront must include:
Purchase Order Number (PO#).
Name of the product.
PO Fulfillment Date (formatted as YY/MM/DD).
If a discount is provided, append the discount percentage and the approver’s last name in the
format: 15% Discount – UserLast.
Example Output:
sql
Copy
2837 – Compendium-Premium Running Shoes – 21/02/16 – 15% Discount – UserLast
Why Option A is Correct:
The expression in Option A achieves the desired result step-by-step:
Question #18
If a discount was given, include the Discount% and the Approver’s Last Name.
Ex. 2837 – Compendium-Premium Running Shoes – 21 /02/16 -15% Discount – UserLast
Which expression below represents the project name that the customer wants?
A)
B)
C)
D)
- A . Option A
- B . Option B
- C . Option C
- D . Option D
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The project name in Workfront must include:
Purchase Order Number (PO#).
Name of the product.
PO Fulfillment Date (formatted as YY/MM/DD).
If a discount is provided, append the discount percentage and the approver’s last name in the
format: 15% Discount – UserLast.
Example Output:
sql
Copy
2837 – Compendium-Premium Running Shoes – 21/02/16 – 15% Discount – UserLast
Why Option A is Correct:
The expression in Option A achieves the desired result step-by-step:
A
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The project name in Workfront must include:
Purchase Order Number (PO#).
Name of the product.
PO Fulfillment Date (formatted as YY/MM/DD).
If a discount is provided, append the discount percentage and the approver’s last name in the
format: 15% Discount – UserLast.
Example Output:
sql
Copy
2837 – Compendium-Premium Running Shoes – 21/02/16 – 15% Discount – UserLast
Why Option A is Correct:
The expression in Option A achieves the desired result step-by-step:
Question #22
Given the array below, a user wants a comma-separated string of all stat names.
What is the correct expression?
A)
B)
C)
D)
- A . Option A
- B . Option B
- C . Option C
- D . Option D
Correct Answer: B
B
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The input is an array containing objects, and the goal is to extract all the stat.name values into a comma-separated string.
Example Input:
[
{
"base_stat": 48,
"effort": 1,
"stat": {
"name": "hp",
"url": "https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/stat/1/"
}
},
{
"base_stat": 48,
"effort": 0,
"stat": {
"name": "attack",
"url": "https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/stat/2/"
}
}
]
Example Output:
"hp, attack"
Why Option B is Correct:
The expression join(map(2.data: stats[]; stats.stat.name); ", "):
map: Iterates through each object in the array (2.data: stats[]) and extracts the stat.name field.
join: Combines the extracted values into a single string, separated by a comma and space (", ").
Breaking it down:
map(2.data: stats[]; stats.stat.name) → Creates an array of names: ["hp", "attack"].
join(…; ", ") → Converts the array into the string "hp, attack".
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A: join(2.data: stats[]; stat.name; ", ")
This syntax is incorrect because it attempts to directly access stat.name within the join function without first mapping the values.
Option C: join(map(2.data: stats[]; stat.name); ", ")
The mapping references stat.name directly but does not account for the nested structure (stats.stat.name).
Option D: join(flatten(2.data: stats[]); ", ")
The flatten function is unnecessary here as the data is already structured. It would not properly extract the stat.name values.
Steps to Implement in Workfront Fusion:
Add a Mapping/Transformation Module.
Use the join(map(…)) function as described to transform the input array into a comma-separated string.
Test the output to ensure it correctly generates the desired format.
How This Solves the Problem:
The map function ensures the proper extraction of nested stat.name values. The join function combines these values into the desired format efficiently. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Functions Documentation
Workfront Community: Using Map and Join Functions
The combination of map and join ensures that the stat names are extracted and formatted into a single comma-separated string, as required.
B
Explanation:
Understanding the Requirement:
The input is an array containing objects, and the goal is to extract all the stat.name values into a comma-separated string.
Example Input:
[
{
"base_stat": 48,
"effort": 1,
"stat": {
"name": "hp",
"url": "https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/stat/1/"
}
},
{
"base_stat": 48,
"effort": 0,
"stat": {
"name": "attack",
"url": "https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/stat/2/"
}
}
]
Example Output:
"hp, attack"
Why Option B is Correct:
The expression join(map(2.data: stats[]; stats.stat.name); ", "):
map: Iterates through each object in the array (2.data: stats[]) and extracts the stat.name field.
join: Combines the extracted values into a single string, separated by a comma and space (", ").
Breaking it down:
map(2.data: stats[]; stats.stat.name) → Creates an array of names: ["hp", "attack"].
join(…; ", ") → Converts the array into the string "hp, attack".
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A: join(2.data: stats[]; stat.name; ", ")
This syntax is incorrect because it attempts to directly access stat.name within the join function without first mapping the values.
Option C: join(map(2.data: stats[]; stat.name); ", ")
The mapping references stat.name directly but does not account for the nested structure (stats.stat.name).
Option D: join(flatten(2.data: stats[]); ", ")
The flatten function is unnecessary here as the data is already structured. It would not properly extract the stat.name values.
Steps to Implement in Workfront Fusion:
Add a Mapping/Transformation Module.
Use the join(map(…)) function as described to transform the input array into a comma-separated string.
Test the output to ensure it correctly generates the desired format.
How This Solves the Problem:
The map function ensures the proper extraction of nested stat.name values. The join function combines these values into the desired format efficiently. Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Functions Documentation
Workfront Community: Using Map and Join Functions
The combination of map and join ensures that the stat names are extracted and formatted into a single comma-separated string, as required.