A multinational clothing company wants to create regional sites for its online presence. Each site would follow the same branding but have unique content per region. The content architecture requires a site per region. Of the options presented below, which is the most efficient approach to deploy the rendering host?

A multinational clothing company wants to create regional sites for its online presence. Each site would follow the same branding but have unique content per region. The content architecture requires a site per region. Of the options presented below, which is the most efficient approach to deploy the rendering host?
A . Use separate instances of XM Cloud for each brand and country to maintain separation.
B . rendering host application deployed for each site.
C . A single rendering host application using the JSS multisite feature.
D . Create a single site collection and site for all brands and countries and also manage their resources manually.

View Answer

Answer: C

Explanation:

For a multinational clothing company looking to create regional sites with the same branding but unique content per region, the most efficient approach is to use a single rendering host application that leverages the JSS multisite feature. This allows for the management of multiple sites within a single instance, facilitating shared resources and centralized updates while still allowing for regional customization.

Reference: The Sitecore XM Cloud documentation suggests using a single rendering host application for multiple sites, which can be achieved through configurations and the JSS multisite feature, as detailed in the editing and rendering hosts section1. This approach aligns with the recommended practices for deploying and managing content in XM Cloud environments2.