What is the recommended setup to ensure clients automatically fallback to their Priority 1 server(s) in case of a faulty SEP Manager?

What is the recommended setup to ensure clients automatically fallback to their Priority 1 server(s) in case of a faulty SEP Manager?
A . Configure all SEP Managers with equal priority
B . Configure all SEP Managers with different priorities
C . Do not configure any priority for SEP Managers
D . Use a separate fallback server

View Answer

Answer: A

Explanation:

To ensure clients can automatically fall back to their Priority 1 server(s) if a SEP Manager fails, it is recommended to configure all SEP Managers with equal priority.

Fallback Mechanism: When SEP Managers are set with equal priority, clients can automatically reconnect to any available server in their priority group. This setup offers a high-availability solution, allowing clients to quickly fall back to another server if their primary SEP Manager becomes unavailable.

Ensuring Continuity: Equal priority settings enable seamless client-server communication, ensuring clients do not experience interruptions in receiving policy updates or security content.

High Availability: This configuration supports a robust failover system where clients are not dependent on a single manager, thus enhancing resilience against server outages.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option B (different priorities) could cause delays in failover as clients would have to exhaust Priority 1 servers before attempting Priority 2 servers.

Option C (no priority configuration) would lead to inconsistent fallback behavior.

Option D (separate fallback server) adds complexity and is not required for effective client fallback.

Therefore, setting all SEP Managers with equal priority is the recommended setup.