Which data locking approach should you recommend?

You are asked to design a case management system for a client in addition to storing some basic metadata about a case, one of the client s requirements Is the ability for users to update a case The client would like any user in their organization of 500 people to be able to make these updates The users are all based in the company’s headquarters, and there will be frequent cases where users are attempting to edit the same case. The client wants to ensure no information Is lost when these edits occur and does not want the solution to burden their process administrators with any additional effort.

Which data locking approach should you recommend?
A . Allow edits without locking the case GDI
B . Use the database lo implement tow lewd pessimistic locking.
C . Add an ©Version annotation to the case COT to manage Vie locking
D . Design a process report and query to determine who opened the edit form first

View Answer

Answer: C

Explanation:

The @Version annotation is a feature of Appian that allows for optimistic locking of CDTs. Optimistic locking assumes that concurrent updates to the same data are rare and does not lock the data until it is saved. If two users try to save changes to the same data, the user who saves first will succeed, while the user who saves second will get an error message and will have to resolve the conflict manually. This approach is suitable for the client’s requirement, as itallows any user to update a case without locking it, ensures no information is lost when concurrent edits occur, and does not require any additional effort from the process administrators. Verified References: [Appian Documentation], section “Optimistic Locking”.