Which two statements are true about route summarization? (Choose two.)
Which two statements are true about route summarization? (Choose two.)
A . It reduces the size of a routing table.
B . It reduces signaling.
C . It summaries the routing table entries into a default route
D . It improves the best route calculation.
Answer: A, B
Explanation:
Route summarization is a technique that reduces the number of routes that a router advertises to its neighbors by creating a single summary route that covers multiple subnets or networks.
Route summarization has several benefits, such as:
It reduces the size of a routing table, which saves memory and CPU resources on the router. A smaller routing table also improves the lookup efficiency and convergence time of the routing protocol.
It reduces signaling, which means that less bandwidth is consumed by routing updates and less processing is required by neighboring routers. This also enhances the stability and scalability of the network, as fewer routing changes are propagated.
It improves route aggregation, which means that more specific routes are replaced by a less specific route that can be advertised to other autonomous systems or routing domains. This simplifies the inter-domain routing and hides the internal topology details.
Route summarization does not necessarily summarize the routing table entries into a default route, although a default route can be considered a special case of route summarization where all destinations are covered by one route. Route summarization also does not improve the best route calculation, as it may introduce suboptimal routing or black holes if not done properly.
Reference: Introduction to Route Summarization – NetworkLessons.com, Route
Summarization > Example for Understanding Route Summarization – Cisco Press
Latest ECP-206 Dumps Valid Version with 60 Q&As
Latest And Valid Q&A | Instant Download | Once Fail, Full Refund