How should the administrator resolve the compliance failure within Objects?

An existing Object bucket was created for backups with these requirements:

* WORM policy of one year

* Versioning policy of one year

* Lifecycle policy of three years

A recent audit has reported a compliance failure. Data that should be retained for three years has been deleted prematurely.

How should the administrator resolve the compliance failure within Objects?
A . Modify the existing bucket versioning policy from one year to three years.
B . Recreate a new bucket with the retention policy of three years.
C . Modify the existing bucket WORM policy from one year to three years.
D . Create a tiering policy to store deleted data on cold storage for three years.

Answer: C

Explanation:

The administrator should resolve the compliance failure within Objects by modifying the existing bucket WORM (Write-Once Read-Many) policy from one year to three years. WORM is a feature that prevents anyone from modifying or deleting data in a bucket while the policy is active. WORM policies help comply with strict data retention regulations that mandate how long specific data must be stored. The administrator can extend the WORM retention period for a bucket at any time, but cannot reduce it or delete it. By extending the WORM policy from one year to three years, the administrator can ensure that data in the bucket is retained for the required duration and not deleted prematurely.

Reference: Nutanix Objects User Guide, page 17; Nutanix Objects Solution Guide, page 9