Face to face planning for collaboration, alignment and adaption is desirable if possible but not essential for geographically remote agile teams on the same ART, which are endorsed to carry out their own planning activitioes, suited to their time zone and particular needs, especially in cases where different languages are in use.
Face to face planning for collaboration, alignment and adaption is desirable if possible but not essential for geographically remote agile teams on the same ART, which are endorsed to carry out their own planning activitioes, suited to their time zone and particular needs, especially in cases where different languages are in use.
A . FALSE
B. TRUE
Answer: A
Explanation:
Face-to-face planning is a key agile and SAFe concept that is always recommended to be followed. Only in circumstances where it is simply too costly or too infeasible is this rule able to be avoided, and in such a case the focus ought to be on splitting up the work to allow it to be co-located. so that’s why it is False.
For more details: https://www.scaledagileframework.com/working-successfully-in-agile-with-remote-team-members/
Latest SPC Dumps Valid Version with 380 Q&As
Latest And Valid Q&A | Instant Download | Once Fail, Full Refund